Direct and indirect impacts of information technology applications on productivity: A field study

International Journal of Electronic Commerce

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 83-102

  Mukhopadhyay, Tridas ^a   Mangal, Vandana ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Business value of information technology; Information technology applications; Information technology productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346876725     PISSN: 10864415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10864415.1997.11518291     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aigner, D.; Lovell, C.; and Schmidt, P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production methods. Journal of Econometrics, 6 (1977), 21-37.
2. Bakos, J.Y., and Kemerer, C.F. Recent applications of economic theory in information technology research. Decision Support Systems, 8 (1992), 365-86.
3. Barua, A.; Kriebel.C.H.;and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6, 1 (March 1995), 3-23.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communication of the ACM, 36, 12 (December 1993), 66-77.
5. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. Paradox lost? Firm level evidence on the returns to information system spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (April 1996), 541-558.
6. Christensen, L.R. and Greene, W.H. Economies of scale in U.S. electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 84 (1976), 655-676.
7. Clemons, E.K., and Weber, B.W. Segmentation, differentiation, and flexible pricing: experiences with information technology and segment-tailored strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 2 (Fall 1994), 9-36.
8. Cornwell, C.; Schmidt, P.; and Sickles, R.C. Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variations in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1990), 185-200.
9. Crowston, K., and Treacy, M.E. Assessing the impact of information technology on enterprise level performance. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. San Diego, 1986, pp. 299-310.
10. Davamanirajan, P.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; and Kriebel, C.H. Assessing the business value of information technology in global wholesale banking: the case of trade services. Journal of Organizational Computing, in press.
11. Goodman, P.S., and Leyden, D.P. Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 4 (1991), 578-586.
12. Goodman, P.S., and Atkin, R.S. Effects of absenteeism on individuals and organizations. In P. 5. Goodman and R. S. Atkin(eds.), Absenteeism: New Approaches to Understanding, Measuring and Managing Employee Absence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 117-134.
13. Hausman, J.A., and Taylor, W.E. Panel data and unobserved individual effects. Econometrica, 49 (1981), 1377-1398.
14. Hulin, C. Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations, In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, vol. 2, pp. 445-505.
15. Hulin, C.; Rozonowski, M.; and Hachiya, D. Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 97 (1985), 233-255.