The empirical character of methodological rules

Philosophy of Science

Volumn 63, Issue 3 SUPPL., 1996, Pages

  Schmaus, Warren ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346854997     PISSN: 00318248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/289941     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Donovan, A., Laudan, L., and Laudan., R. (eds.), (1988), Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Doppelt, G. (1986), "Relativism and the Reticulational Model of Scientific Rationality", Synthese 69: 225-252.
3. Doppelt, G. (1990), "The Naturalist Conception of Methodological Standards in Science: A Critique", Philosophy of Science 57: 1-19.
4. Kaiser, M. (1991), "Progress and Rationality: Laudan's Attempt to Divorce a Happy Couple", Inquiry 34: 433-455.
5. _. (1993), "Discussion: Philosophers Adrift? Comments on the Alleged Disunity of Method", Philosophy of Science 60: 500-512.
6. Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. _. (1984), Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. _. (1986), "Some Problems Facing Intuitionist Meta-Methodologies", Synthese 67: 115-129.
9. _. (1987a), "Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for a Normative Naturalism", American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 19-31.
10. _. (1987b), "Methodology's Prospects", in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 347-354.
11. _. (1987c), "Relativism, Naturalism and Reticulation", Synthese 71: 221-234.
12. _. (1989), "If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40: 369-375.
13. _. (1990a), Science and Relativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. _. (1990b). "Normative Naturalism", Philosophy of Science 57: 44-59.
15. _. (1990c), "Aim-less Epistemology?" Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 315-322.
16. _. (1990d), "Demystifying Underdetermination", in C. Wade Savage (ed). Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 267-297.
17. Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., Thagard, P., and Wykstra, S. (1986), "Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research", Synthese 69: 141-223.
18. Laudan, R., and Laudan, L. (1989), "Dominance and the Disunity of Method: Solving the Problems of Innovation and Consensus", Philosophy of Science 56: 221-237.
19. Laudan, L., and Leplin, J. (1991), "Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination", Journal of Philosophy 88: 449-472.
20. Longino, H. (1990), Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Nickles, T. (1986), "Remarks on the Use of History as Evidence", Synthese 69: 253-266.
22. Quinn, P. L. (1987), "Comments on Laudan's 'Methodology: Its Prospects' ", in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 355-358.
23. Resnick, D. B. (1992), "Discussion: Are Methodological Rules Hypothetical Imperatives?" Philosophy of Science 59: 498-507.
24. Rosenberg, A. (1990). "Normative Naturalism and the Role of Philosophy", Philosophy of Science 57: 34-43.
25. Stump, D. (1991), "Fallibilism, Naturalism and the Traditional Requirements for Knowledge", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22: 451-469.