Detecting juvenile survival effects of habitat actions: Power analysis applied to endangered Snake River spring-summer chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 60, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1122-1132

  Paulsen, Charles M ^a   Fisher, Timothy R ^b  

^a Paulsen Environmental Research Ltd   (United States)

^b Fisher Fisheries Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; FISHERY REGULATION; JUVENILE; SALMONID; SURVIVAL;

NORTH AMERICA; SNAKE RIVER; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE; SERPENTES;

EID: 0346816637     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f03-094     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Achord, S., Eppard, M.B., Sanford, B.P., and Matthews, G.M. 1997. Monitoring the migrations of wild Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon smolts - Annual Report 1996. Report of National Marine Fisheries Service to U.S. DOE Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oreg.
2. Bayley, P.B. 2002. A review of studies on responses of salmon and trout to habitat change, with potential for application in the Pacific Northwest. Report to the Washington State Independent Science Panel (URL: http://www.governor.wa.gov/gsro/science/ 050802bayley.pdf).
3. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., and Welch, R.E. 1980. Regression diagnostics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
4. Beschta, R.L., Platts, W.S., and Kauffman, B. 1991. Field review of fish habitat improvement projects in the Grande Ronde and John Day River basins of eastern Oregon. Prepared for U.S. DOE Bonneville Power Administration Contract No. DE-AP79-91BP2149, Portland, Oreg.
5. Bjornn, T.C. 1978. Survival, production, and yield of trout and chinook salmon in the Lemhi River, Idaho. College of Forestry and Range Sciences, University of Idaho, Boise, Idaho, Bull. No. 27.
6. Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
8. Elms-Cockrum, T.J. 2001. 1999 salmon spawning ground surveys. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho.
9. Hassemer, P. 1993. Salmon spawning ground surveys, 1989-92. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho.
10. Kauffman, B., Beschta, R.L., and Platts, W.S. 1993. Fish habitat improvement projects in the Fifteenmile Creek and Trout Creek basins of central Oregon: field review and management recommendations. Prepared for U.S. DOE Bonneville Power Administration, Contract Nos. DE-BI79-84BP18955 and DE-BI79-91BP14812, Portland, Oreg.
11. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2000. 2000 Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion (URL: http://www.nwr. noaa.gov/lhydrop/hydroweb/ docs/Final/2000Biop.html).
12. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2002. Time bias corrected divisional temperature-precipitation-drought index. (URL: http://www.ncdc.noaagov/oa/climate/onlineprod/drought/ftppage.html)
13. Osenberg, C.W., and Schmitt, R.J. 1996. Detecting ecological impacts caused by human activities. In Detecting ecological impacts: concepts and applications in coastal habitats. Edited by C.W. Osenberg and R.J. Schmitt. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. pp. 3-16.
14. Pacific States Marine Fish Commission (PSMFC). 2002. Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System (PTAGIS). (URL: http:// www.psmfc.org/pittag/)
15. Paulsen, C.M., and Fisher, T.R. 2001. Statistical relationship between parr-to-smolt survival of Snake River spring-summer chinook salmon and indices of land use. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130: 347-358.
16. Paulsen, C.M., and Hinrichsen, R.A. 2002. Experimental management for Snake River spring-summer chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): trade-offs between conservation and learning for a threatened species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 717-725.
17. Peters, C.N., and Marmorek, D.R. 2001. Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River spring and summer chinook salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 2431-2446.
18. Roni, P., Lierman, M., and Steel, A. 2003. Monitoring and evaluating responses of salmonids and other fishes to instream restoration. In Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers. Edited by D.R. Montgomery and D.B. Booth. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash. pp. 318-339.
19. Smith, S.G., Skalski, J.R., Schlechte, J.W., Hoffmann, A., and Cassen, V. 1994. Statistical survival analysis of fish and wildlife tagging studies: SURPH.1. Developed by the Center for Quantitative Science, School of Fisheries, University of Washington, for U.S. DOE Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oreg.
20. Solazzi, M.F., Nickelson, I.E., Johnson, S.L., and Rogers, J.D. 2000. Effects of increasing winter rearing habitat on abundance of salmonids in two coastal Oregon streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 906-914.
21. Thompson, W.L., and Lee, D.C. 2002. A two-stage information-theoretic approach to modeling landscape-level attributes and maximum recruitment of chinook salmon in the Columbia River basin. Nat. Res. Model. 15: 227-257.