In the Name of Law: Legality and Morality in Postcolonial Hong Kong

International Journal of the Sociology of Law

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 185-205

  Man, Sin Wai ^a   Wai, Chu Yiu ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346786626     PISSN: 01946595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijsl.1999.0088     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. A-G v. Times Newspapers Ltd (1974) AC 273.
2. A-G v. Times Newspapers Ltd (1979) 2 EHRR 245.
3. A Teacup in a Storm, 9-10 July 1997 (a radio program of Hong Kong Commercial Radio) (in Chinese).
4. Alexander, L. & Kress, K. (1995) Against legal principles. In Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (Marmr, A., Ed.) Clarendon Press: Oxford.
5. Berlin, I. (1969) Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
6. Bhabha, H. (1997) Editor's introduction: minority maneuvers and unsettled Negotiations. Critical Inquiry 23, 431-459.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1987) The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal 38, 805-853.
8. Braude, J. (1997) Repel Repressive Law. South China Morning Post: 3 June 1997.
9. Calhoun, C. (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Chan Kam Nga & Others v. Director of Immigration, 1999, FACV 13/1998.
11. Cheung Lai Wah & Others v. Director of Immigration, 1997, 3 HKC 64.
12. Cheung Lai Wah & Others v. Director of Immigration, 1998a, CACV 203, 216- 8/1997, CA, 2 April 1998.
13. Cheung Lai Wah & Others v. Director of Immigration, 1998b, CACV 203, 216- 8/1997, 20 May 1998.
14. Cheung Lai Wah & Others v. Director of Immigration, 1999, FACV 16/1998.
15. Chin, W. K. (1997) Looking through the child IIs issue at the hindrance of legal thinking in Hong Kong. Ming Pao: 16 July 1997 (in Chinese).
16. Dyzenhaus, D. (1996) The legitimacy of legality. University of Toronto Law Journal 46, 129-180.
17. Fish, S. (1996) At the Federalist society. Howard Law Journal 39, 728-729.
18. Fish, S. (1997) Boutique multiculturalism, or why liberals are incapable of thinking about hate speech. Critical Inquiry 23, 378-395.
19. Habermas, J. (translated by Thomas McCarthy) (1976) Legitimation Crisis. Polity: Cambridge.
20. Habermas, J. (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere (Calhoun, C., Ed.). M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, MA.
21. Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity: Cambridge.
22. HKSAR v. Ma Wai Kwan David & Others, 1997, 2 HKC 315.
23. Hong Kong Economic Journal, Editorials, 5 July 1997, 12 July 1997.
24. Immigration Amendment (No 2) Ordinance 1997.
25. Immigration Amendment (No 3) Ordinance 1997.
26. In Re. An Application by the Attorney General for Committal for Contempt of Court MP 12/76.
27. Lau Chun To (1997) An applause to the legal profession for defending the rule of law. Ming Pao: 14 July 1997 (in Chinese).
28. Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong (1987) Report on Contempt of Court (Topic 4).
29. Lo Sau-king v. R (1962) HKLR 124.
30. Lowe, N. & Sufrin, B. (1996) The Law of Contempt (3rd Edn.) Butterworths: London, Dublin and Edinburgh.
31. Lukes, S. (1994) The singular and the plural: on the distinctive Liberalism of Isaiah Berlin. Social Research 61 (3), 686-717.
32. MacIntyre, A. (1998) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame.
33. Peerenboom, R.P. (1993) Law and Morality in Ancient China: The Silk Manuscripts of Huang-Lao. Sri Satgure: Delhi.
34. Perry, M.J. (1988) Morality, Politics and Law. Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford.
35. The Queen v. South China Morning Post (1955) HKLR 120.
36. R v. Sau-king (1950) HKLR 26.
37. Samuels, H. (1997) Child victims of immigration law and policy: a study of the effect of Hong Kong Immigration Law on children and their families. The International Journal of Children's Rights 5, 97-122.
38. Sin, W.M. & Chu, Y.W. (1998) Whose rule of law? Rethinking the legal culture in post-colonial Hong Kong. Social and Legal Studies 7(2), 147-169.
39. South China Morning Post: 27 January 1994. Call for One Law on Contempt Rejected.
40. South China Morning Post: 25 March 1994. Papers Could Face Legal Action.
41. South China Morning Post: 26 May 1995. Tycoon Yeung Acquitted.
42. South China Morning Post: 10 September 1996. Articles in Newspaper Prejudicial, Court Told.
43. South China Morning Post: 16 April 1997. Will Justice be Seen to be Done.
44. South China Morning Post: 13 July 1997. Lawyers Join Children in Abode Fight.
45. South China Morning Post: 30 July 1997. Legislature Left Open to Attack.
46. South China Morning Post: 1 August 1997. A Win for the Rule of Law.
47. South China Morning Post: 26 October 1997. Judge Attacks Editor over 'Secret' Letter.
48. South China Morning Post: 28 April 1999. 1000-A-Day Have Right of Abode.
49. Taylor, C. (1995) Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press: Cambridge and London.
50. Unger, R. M. (1983) The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
51. Walker, S. (1991) Freedom of speech and contempt of Court: the English and Australian approaches compared. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 40, 583-606.
52. Wang, H., Leo Ou-fan, L. & Fischer, M. (1994) Is the public sphere unspeakable in China? Can public spaces lead to public spheres? Public Culture 6, 598-605.
53. Wen Wei Pau and others v. R (1959) HKLR 216.