The use of empirical data sources in HRA

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 139-143

  Hallbert, Bruce ^a   Gertman, David ^a   Lois, Erasmia ^b   Marble, Julie ^a   Blackman, Harold ^a   Byers, James ^a  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

Human Reliability Assessment; Performance shaping factors; Probabilistic risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR SIMULATORS; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; RELIABILITY THEORY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT (HRA); PERFORMANCE-SHAPING FACTORS (PSF);

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 0346781560     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Swain A.D., Guttmann H.E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications (NUREG/CR-1278). 1983;USNRC, Washington, DC.
2. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method CREAM. 1998;Elsevier, New York.
3. Williams J.C. A databased method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. 1988;Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers, New York. p. 436-50.
4. Sträter O. Evaluation of human reliability on the basis of operational experience. GRS-170. 2000;GRS, Köln, Germany.
5. Byers J.C., et al. Simplified Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Methodology: Comparisons with other HRA Methods. In: Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2000;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA. p. 3-177-3-180.
6. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA) (NUREG-1624, Rev. 1). 2000;USNRC, Washington, DC.
7. Woods D.D., Roth E., Pople H. An artificial intelligence based cognitive model for human performance assessment. NUREG/CR-4852. 1987;US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
8. Siegel A.I., Wolf J.J. Man-machine simulation models. 1969;Wiley/Interscience, New York, NY.
9. Shukri T., Mosleh A. A dynamic PRA model, ADS-IDA: its advantages and possible applications. In: Proceedings of the PSAM IV Conference, CD-ROM, NY. 1998;Springer, NY.
10. Cacciabue P.C., Hollnagel E. Human models in reliability and safety analysis of interactive systems. In: Proceedings of Probabilistic Safety Assessment International Topical Meeting PSA 1993. Clearwater Beach, FL, January 27-29. 1993;American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL. p. 1353-59.
11. Dang V.N., Reer B. Benchmarking current HRA methods: insights from a study of SLIM calibration options. In: Proceedings of the PSAM IV Conference, CD-ROM, NY. 1998;Springer, New York.
12. Sui N.O. Risk assessment for dynamic systems: an overview. Reliab Engng Syst Saf. 43:1994;43-73.
13. Eiff G. Personal communication; February 1998.
14. Wickens C., Liu Y. Codes and modalities in multiple resources: a success and a qualification. Hum Factors. 30:1988;599-616.
15. Soetens E., Hueting J., Wauters F. Traces of fatigue in an attention task. Bull Psychonom Soc. 30:1992;97-100.
16. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor Safety Study: an assessment of accident risks in US commercial Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014); 1975.
17. Lewis H.W., et al. Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1978;. NUREG/CR-0400.