"Scientifically Based Research" and Qualitative Inquiry

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 133-137

  Giangreco, Michael F ^a   Taylor, Steven J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346756082     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.28.3.133     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Educational Research Association. (2003, January 26). Resolution on the essential elements of scientifically based research. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/meeting/councilresolution03.htm. Accessed May 1, 2003.
2. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
3. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Education research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31, 18-20.
4. Biklen, D. (1988). The myth of clinical judgment. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 127-140.
5. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Calaprice, A. (Ed.) (2000). The expanded quotable Einstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Caracelli, V. J., & Preskill, H. (Eds.). (2000). The expanding scope of evaluation use [Topical Issue]. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 88.
8. Cook, T. D. (1997). Lessons learned in evaluation over the past twenty-five years. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish, Jr. (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmoderism. Mental Retardation, 35, 93-106.
10. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research, Educational Researcher, 31, 21-24.
11. Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2002). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: NY: Anchor Books.
14. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Jones, S. R. (1996). Toward inclusive theory: Disability as social construction. NASPA Journal, 33, 347-354.
16. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Law, M., (2002). Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, Inc.
18. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1982). Numbers and narrative: Combining their strengths in research reviews. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 1-26.
19. McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 65-72.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002, January 8).
22. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002) Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.) (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, an imprint of the National Academies Press.
26. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resources (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.