Fatigue and fracture toughness of acrylic bone cements modified with long-chain amine activators

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 571-577

  Deb, S ^a   Lewis, G ^b   Janna, S W ^b   Vazquez, B ^c   San Roman, J ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE POLÍMEROS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acrylic bone cements; Fatigue; Fracture toughness; Long chain amine activators

Indexed keywords

AMINES; CRACKS; FATTY ACIDS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CEMENTED ARTHROPLASTY;

BONE CEMENT;

4 METHYLANILINE; 4 N,N DIMETHYL 4 TOLUIDINE; 4 N,N DIMETHYLAMINOBENZYL LAURATE; 4 N,N DIMETHYLAMINOBENZYL OLEATE; ACRYLIC CEMENT; AMINE; LONG CHAIN FATTY ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PERFORMANCE; RANK SUM TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSION;

EID: 0346753842     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10065     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Haas SS, Brauer GM, Dickson G. A characterization of poly-(methylmethacrylate) bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57A: 380-391.
2. Brauer GM, Steinberger DR, Stansbury JW. Dependence of curing time, peak temperature and mechanical properties on the composition of bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20: 839-852.
3. Taningher M, Pasquini R, Bonatti S. Genotoxicity analysis of N,N dimethyl p-toluidine and N,N dimethyl aniline. Environ Mol Mutagen 1993;21:349-356.
4. Boesch P, Herms H, Lintner F. Detection of the catalytic constituents of dimethyl-p-toluidine even after long-term implantation. Arch Toxicol 1982;51:157-166.
5. Vazquez B, San Roman J, Deb S, Bonfield W. Application of long chain amine activator in conventional acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:131-139.
6. Vazquez B, Deb S, Bonfield W, San Roman J. Characterization of new acrylic bone cements prepared with oleic acid derivatives. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:88-97.
7. Topoleski LDT, Ducheyene P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:135-154.
8. Spector M. Biomaterial failure. Orthop Clin N Am 1992;23:211-217.
9. Hastings NAJ, Peacock. JB. Statistical distributions. London: Butterworth, Ltd.; 1975.
10. Shigley JE, Mischke CR. Mechanical engineering design. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
11. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard D 5045-99. Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. 2001 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 08.03. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2001. p 347-355.
12. Lewis G, Janna S, Carroll M. Effect of test frequency on the in vitro fatigue life of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2003;26: 1111-1117.
13. Lewis G, Mladsi S. Effect of sterilization method on properties of Palacos R acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 1998;19:117-124.
14. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;38:155-182.