Estimation of mating-compatibility of the wild service tree (Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz) by observing pollen tube germination

Journal of Applied Genetics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 253-258

  Wojciechowski, Andrzej ^a   Bednorz, Leszek ^b  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Fluorescence; Mating compatibility; Self incompatibility; Sorbus torminalis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346740977     PISSN: 12341983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BREWBAKER J.L. (1959). Biology of the angiosperm pollen grain. Indium. J. Genet. 19: 121-133.
2. CAMPBELL C.D., GREENE C., BERGQUIST S.E. (1987). Apomixis and sexuality in three species of Amelanchier, shadbush (Rosaceae: Malloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 74: 321-328.
3. CAMPBELL C., GREENE C., DICKINSON T. (1991). Reproductive biology in subfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae). Systematic Botany 16(2): 333-349.
4. DARLINGTON C.D., MATHER K. (1949). The elements of genetics. Allene and Unwin Ltd. London.
5. GABRIELIAN E. (1961). The genus Sorbus in Turkey. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 4: 483-496.
6. GUSTAFSSON A. (1947). Apomixis in higher plants, Vols. II-III. Acta Univ. Lundensis: 43(2): 71-178 and 43(12): 183-370.
7. GUSTAFSSON A. (1947). Apomixis in higher plants, Vols. II-III. Acta Univ. Lundensis: 43(2): 71-178 and 43(12): 183-370.
8. HAWKINS C.F., EVANS A.M. (1973). Elucidating the behaviour of pollen tubes in intra and interspecific pollinations of Phaseolus vulgaris. Euphytica 22: 378-385.
9. HEDLUND T. (1901). Monographie der Gattung Sorbus. Kongl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl. 35: 1-147.
10. HEDLUND T. (1948). Om uppkomsten av nya livstyper inom släktet Sorbus. Bot. Not. Lund (quotation after Liljefors 1953).
11. 1 plants. Euphytica 25: 1-10.
12. JANKUN A. (1993). Role of apomixis in the evolution of the genus Sorbus (Rosaceae). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 38, 2: 627-686.
13. KOVANDA M. (1961). Spontaneous hybrids of Sorbus in Czechoslovakia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologia 1: 41-83.
14. LILJEFORS A. (1953). Studies on propagation, embryology, and pollination in Sorbus. Acta Horti. Bergiani 16, 10: 277-329.
15. MARTIN F. (1959). Staining and observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34: 125-128.
16. MATSUZAWA Y. (1983). Studies of the interspecific hybridisation in genus Brassica. II. Crossability in interspecific crosses, B. oleracea x B. campestris. Japan J. Breed. 33: 321-330.
17. PACYNIAK C. (1991). Let us introduce Sorbus torminalis to woodlands (in Polish). Las Polski 6: 10-11.
18. PHIPPS J.B., ROBERTSON K.R., SMITH P.G. & ROHRER J.R. (1990). A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Can. J. Bot. 68: 2209-2269.
19. STECKI K. (1950). Sorbus torminalis: endangered tree of our woodlands (in Polish). Chrońmy Przyrodȩ Ojczysta̧. (Ed. Polska Akademia Umiejȩtności, Kraków), 1-2: 3-11.
20. VUILLEUMIER B.S. (1967). The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. Evolution 21: 210-226.
21. WOJCIECHOWSKI A. (1985). Interspecific hybrids between Brassica campestris L. and B. oleracea L. I. Effectiveness of crossing. Pollen tube growth. Embryogenesis. Genetica Polonica 26, 4: 1-10.