Feasibility of using an active actuator for two-dimensional vibration abatement in a turning process

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics

Volumn 216, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 335-342

  Yan, W Y ^a   Al Jumaily, A M ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Smart; Toolpost; Turning; Vibration

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346739157     PISSN: 14644193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/146441902320992428     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jang, D. Y. and Seireg, A. Tool natural frequency as the control parameter for surface roughness. Mach. Vibr., 1992, 1, 147-154.
2. Oberst, H. and Al-Jumaily, A. M. An active tool holder for attenuating radial and tangential vibration in a turning process. In Proceedings of 7th Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 23-24 November 2000, pp. 77-182.
3. Kim, K. J. and Ha, J. Y. Suppression of machine tool chatter using a viscoelastic dynamic damper. Trans. ASME, 1987, 109, 58-65.
4. Nessler, G. L., Brown, D. L., Stouffer, D. C. and Maddox, K. C. Design of a viscoelastic dynamic absorber for machine tool applications. Trans. ASME, August 1977, 620-623.
5. Stone, B. J. and Andrew, C. Vibration absorber for machine tool. In Proceedings of 9th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, 1969, pp. 645-657.
6. Comstock, T. R., Tse, F. S. and Lemon, J. R. Application of controlled mechanical impedance for reducing machine tool vibrations. J. Engng for Industry, November 1969, 1057-1062.
7. Inman, D. J. Engineering Vibration, 1994 (Prentice-Hall).
8. Tsao, T. C. and Tomizuka, M. Robust adaptive and repetitive digital tracking control and application to a hydraulic servo for noncircular machining. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt and Control, 1994, 116(3), 24-32.
9. Tsao, T. C. and Tomizuka, M. Adaptive and repetitive digital control algorithms for non-circular machining. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 1998, pp. 115-120.
10. Rojas, J. and Liang, C. Experimental investigation of active machine tool vibration control. Active Control Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, SPIE, Vol. 2721, 1996, pp. 373-384.
11. Hakansson, L., Sturesson, P.-O. and Claesson, I. Active control of machine-tool vibration. 6th International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Melbourne, 29 November-1 December 1995.
12. ∞ vibration control for machining using active dynamic absorber technology. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, Vol. 1, 1995, pp. 739-794.
13. Altintas, Y. Manufacturing Automation, 2000 (Cambridge University Press).
14. Foreman, E. P. M. and Al-Jumaily, A. M. An effective control scheme for an actively controlled tool post. In Proceedings of 7th Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Post-graduate Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 23-24 November 2000, pp. 125-128.
15. Reed, R. S. Active vibration isolation using a magnetostrictive actuator, System Engineering Department, US Naval Academy at Annapolis, technical paper, 1989.
16. Merritt, H. E. Theory of self-excited machine tool chatter: contribution to machine tool chatter research-1. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1965, 87, 447-454.
17. Kanizar, W. I., Liu, D., Moon, K. S. and Sutherland, J. W. A magnetostrictive actuator based micropositioner and its application in turning. Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, SPIE, Vol. 2721, 1996, pp. 385-393.
18. Endres, W. J., Sutherland, R. E., Devor, J. W. and Kapoor, S. G. A dynamic model of the cutting force system in the turning process. In Proceedings of Symposium on Monitoring and Control for Manufacturing Process, 1990, 44, 193-199.