Public involvement in the planning process: EIA and lessons from the Örebro airport extension, Sweden

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 59-68

  Soneryd, Linda ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Airport; Deliberative democracy; Environmental impact assessment; Power; Public involvement; Sweden

Indexed keywords

AIRPORT; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HUMAN RIGHTS; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; SWEDEN;

ARENA;

EID: 0346724686     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2003.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation J. Am. Inst. Planners 354 1969 216-244
2. Bachrach P. Baratz M. Two faces of power Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 56 1962 947-952
3. Bjarnadóttir, H., Hilding-Rydevik, T., 2001. Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Sweden. Some Unresolved Issues and Challenges in the Design and Implementation of the Forthcoming Planning and EIA Processes. SKI Report 01:24. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm.
4. Cortner H.J. Making science relevant to environmental policy, environmental science Environ. Sci. Policy 31 2000 21-30
5. Dahl R.A. The concept of power J. Soc. Gen. Syst. Res. 2 1957 201-215
6. Dresner S. Gilbert N. Decision-making processes for projects requiring environmental impact assessment: case studies in six European countries J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 11 1999 105-130
7. Eder, K., 2000. Taming risks through dialogues: the rationality and functionality of discursive institutions in risk society. In: Cohen, M.J. (Ed.), Risk in the Modern Age. MacMillan Press Ltd., London, pp. 225-248.
8. EIA, 1997. The application from Örebro Airport Company. The National Franchise Board for Environmental Protection. Journal number 171-190-97. Act number 221. The Environmental Office in Örebro, SE-701 35 Örebro, Sweden.
9. EIA, 1998. Decision from the National Franchise Board for Environmental Protection. Report number 52. The Environmental Office in Örebro, SE-701 35 Örebro, Sweden.
10. Elster, J., 1998. Deliberation and constitution making. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 97-122.
11. Fiorino, D.J., 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 15 (2) 226-243.
12. Gambetta, D., 1998. "Claro!": an essay on discursive machismo. In: Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-43.
13. Habermas, J., 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press, Boston.
14. Habermas, J., 1999. Popular sovereignty as procedure. In: Bohman, J., Rehg, W. (Eds), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997, second edition 1999), pp. 35-66.
15. Hilding-Rydevik, T. (Ed.), 2001. EIA, Large Development Projects and Decision making in the Nordic Countries. Nordregio, Stockholm.
16. Hokkanen, P., 2001. EIA and decision making in search of each other. In: Hilding-Rydevik, T. (Ed.), EIA, Large Development Projects and Decisionmaking in the Nordic Countries. Nordregio, Stockholm, pp. 95-151.
17. Hunt, J., Szerszynski, B., 1999. How was it for you? Issues and dilemmas in the evaluation of deliberative processes. In O'Riordan, T., Burgess, J., Szerszynski, B. (Eds.), Deliberative and Inclusionary Processes. A Report From Two Seminars. CSERGE Working Paper PA 99-06, pp. 29-35.
18. Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. Routledge, New York.
19. Joss, S.A., 1998. The Role of Participation in Institutionalised Technology Assessment. A Case Study of Consensus Conferences. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London, London.
20. Kemp R. O'Riordan T. Purdue M. Investigation as legitimacy: the maturing of the big public inquiry Geoforum 153 1984 477-488
21. Leknes E. The role of EIA in the decision-making process Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 21 2001 309-334
22. Lukes, S., 1974. Power: A Radical View. Macmillan Press, London.
23. O'Riordan, T., Burgess, J., Szerszynski, B. (Eds.), Deliberative and Inclusionary Processes. A Report from Two Seminars. CSERGE Working Paper PA 99-06.
24. Petts, J. (Ed.), 1999. Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
25. Renn, O., Webler, T., Wideman, P. (Eds.), 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
26. Uhrwing, M., 2001. Tillträde till maktens rum. Om intresseorganisationer och miljöpolitiskt beslutsfattande (Access to the power sphere. On interest organisations and decision making on environmental policy). Gidlunds Förlag, Hedemora.
27. Wood, Ch., 1996. Evaluation of the Performance of EIA Process. Final Report. Volume 1: Main Report. Directive 85/337/EEC: Report 1, European Commission, Manchester.
28. Wynne, B., 1982. Rationality and Ritual. The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain. The British Society for the History of Science, Chalfont St Giles.