Rubrics: Design and use in science teacher education

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 107-121

  Luft, Julie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346707438     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009471931127     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993), Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (1994). Making assessment meaningful. ASCD Update, 56(6), 1, 4.
3. Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.
4. Brooks, J. G, & Brooks, M. G. (1993). search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, I, Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Education Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
6. Finson, K. D. (1994). Science alternative assessment models in Illinois. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 97-110.
7. Ford, M. P. (1994). Portfolios and rubrics: Teachers' close encounters with self-evaluation as learners in teacher education courses. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
8. Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
9. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10. Herr, N., Holtzer, M., Martin, M., Esterle, R., & Sparks, C. (1995), Preparing student teachers for alternative assessment in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(1), 27-32.
11. Hudson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science and Education, 1, 115-144.
12. Jensen, K. (1996). Effective rubric design: Making the most of this powerful assessment tool. The Science Teacher, 64(5), 34-37.
13. Lebowitz, S. (1998, April). Use of vee-maps in a college science laboratory. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
14. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-40.
15. Liu, K. (1995). Rubrics revisited: Allowing students to assume responsibility for the quality of their work. The Science Teacher, 62(7), 49-51.
16. Luft, J. (1997). Design your own rubric. Science Scope, 20(5), 25-27
17. Luft, J., Ebert-May, D., Eslamieh, C., & Buss, R. (1997). A status report of initial certification in science and mathematics at Arizona regents' universities. Phoenix: Arizona Board of Regents.
18. Lundberg, R. (1997). Student-generated assessment. The Science Teacher, 64(1), 50-53.
19. McColskey, W., & O'Sullivan, R. (1993). How to assess student performance in science: Going beyond multiple-choice tests. Greensboro: SouthEastern Regional Vision for Education, University of North Carolina.
20. Moscovici, H., & Gilmer, P. (1996). Testing assessment strategies: The ups and the downs for science-teaching faculty. Journal of College Science Teaching, 25(5), 319-323.
21. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Nott, L., Reeve, C., & Reeve, R. (1992). Scoring rubrics: An assessment option. Science Scope, 15(6), 44-45.
23. Ochs, V. D. (1996). Assessing habits of mind through performance based assessment in science. J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Issues in science education (p. 114-122), Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
24. Pizzini, E. L. (Ed.). (1996). SSCS implementation handbook. Iowa City: Science Education Center, University of Iowa.
25. Quellmalz, E. S. (1991). Developing criteria for performance assessments: The missing link. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 319-992.
26. Radford, D. L., Ramsey, L. L., & Deese, W. C. (1995). Demonstration assessment: Measuring conceptual understanding and critical thinking with rubrics. The Science Teacher, 62(1), 52-55.
27. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.
28. Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43-50.
29. Saunders, W. (1992). The constructivist perspective: Implications and teaching strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136-141.
30. Schlitt, D., & Abraham, M. R. (1973). Verbal interaction: A means for self evaluation. School Science and Mathematics, 75(8), 678-686.
31. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32. Shaka, F. L., & Bitner, B. L. (1996, January). Construction and validation of a rubric for scoring concept maps. Paper presented at the Association for the Educators of Teachers of Science, Seattle, WA.
33. Shulman, L. S. (1984). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
34. Yager, R. E., Kellerman, L. R., Liu, C. T., Blunck, S. M, & Veronesi, P. D. (Eds.) (1993). The Iowa assessment handbook. Iowa City: Science Education Center, University of Iowa.
35. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.