Remarks: A Public Law Perspective

Yale Law Journal

Volumn 106, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 2209-2212

  Melamed, A Douglas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346673150     PISSN: 00440094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/797167     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. See Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1089 (1972).
2. See A. Douglas Melamed, Antitrust: The New Regulation, 10 ANTITRUST 13 (1995).
3. Spur Indus., Inc. v. Del E. Webb Dev. Co., 494 P.2d 700 (Ariz. 1972).
4. See 47 U.S.C. § 271(c); see also H.R. CONF. REP. No. 104-458, at 147 (1996).
5. See Hoescht AG, FTC Docket No. 3629 (Dec. 5, 1995); Eli Lilly & Co., FTC Docket No. C-3594 (July 28, 1995); 61 Fed. Reg. 31,117 (June 19, 1996) (final consent order and Commission statement); 61 Fed. Reg. 16,794 (Apr. 17, 1996) (final consent order and Commission statement); 60 Fed. Reg. 49,609 (Sept. 26, 1995) (proposed consent order with analysis to aid public comment); 59 Fed. Reg. 60,815 (Nov. 28, 1994) (proposed consent agreement with analysis to aid public comment).
6. See Saul Levmore, Unifying Remedies: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Startling Rules, 106 YALE L.J. 2149 (1997).
7. See Emily Sherwin, Introduction: Property Rules as Remedies, 106 YALE L.J. 2083 (1997).
8. See James E. Krier & Stewart J. Schwab, Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light, 70 N.Y.U. L. REV. 440, 462-64 (1995).
9. See Ian Ayres & J.M. Balkin, Legal Entitlements as Auctions: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Beyond, 106 YALE L.J. 703 (1996).
10. See Richard A. Epstein, A Clear View of The Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules, 106 YALE L.J. 2091, 2097 (1997).
11. Carol M. Rose, The Shadow of The Cathedral, 106 YALE L.J. 2175 (1997).