Categorical versus dimensional models of mental disorder: The taxometric evidence

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 696-704

  Haslam, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Category; Classification; Dimension; Taxometric analysis

Indexed keywords

BORDERLINE STATE; DEPRESSION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDER; EATING DISORDER; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; HUMAN; MELANCHOLIA; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; NEUROSIS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOPATHY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCHIZOTYPAL PERSONALITY DISORDER;

HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS;

EID: 0346656682     PISSN: 00048674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2003.01258.x     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Jablensky A. The nature of psychiatric classification. Issues beyond ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 33:137-144.
2. Livesley WJ, Schroeder ML, Jackson DN, Jang KL. Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder. Implications for classification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1994; 103:6-17.
3. McHugh PR, Slavney PR. The perspectives of psychiatry, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
4. Reznek LR. The philosophical defense of psychiatry. London: Routledge, 1991.
5. Kagan J. Galen's prophecy. New York: Basic, 1994.
6. Meehl PE. Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality 1992; 60:117-174.
7. Gangestad SW, Snyder M. 'To carve nature at its joints': on the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review 1985; 92:317-349.
8. Kendell RA. The role of diagnosis in psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1975.
9. Grayson D. Can categorical and dimensional views of psychiatric illness be distinguished? British Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 151:355-361.
10. Murphy EA. One cause? Many causes? The argument from the bimodal distribution. Journal of Chronic Disease 1964; 17:301-324.
11. Grove WM. The validity of taxometric inferences based on cluster analysis stopping rules. In: Grove WM, Cicchetti D, eds. Thinking clearly about psychology, Vol. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991; 313-329.
12. Gibbons RD, Dorus E, Ostrow DG, Pandey GN, Davis JM, Levy DL. Mixture distributions in psychiatric research. Biological Psychiatry 1984; 19:935-961.
13. Meehl PE. Bootstraps taxometrics: solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist 1995; 50:266-275.
14. Waller NG, Meehl PE. Multivariate taxometric procedures: distinguishing types from continua. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
15. Meehl PE, Yonce LJ. Taxometric analysis. II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports 1996; 78:1091-1227.
16. Cleland C, Rothschild L, Haslam N. Detecting latent taxa. Monte Carlo comparison of taxometric, admixture and clustering procedures. Psychological Reports 2000; 87:37-47.
17. Haslam N, Kim HC. Categories and continua: a review of taxometric research. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs 2002; 128:271-320.
18. Flett GL, Vredenburg K, Krames L. The continuity of depression in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Bulletin 1997; 121:395-416.
19. Solomon A, Haaga DAF, Arnow BA. Is clinical depression distinct from subthreshold depressive symptoms? A review of the continuity issue in depression research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2001; 189:498-506.
20. Kessler RC. The categorical versus dimensional assessment controversy in the sociology of mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2002; 43:171-188.
21. Beach SRH, Amir N. Is depression taxonic, dimensional, or both? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003; 112:228-236.
22. Franklin CL, Strong DR, Greene RL. A taxometric analysis of the MMPI-2 depression scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 2002; 79:110-121.
23. Ruscio AM, Ruscio J. The latent structure of analogue depression: should the BDI be used to classify groups? Psychological Assessment 2002; 14:135-145.
24. Ruscio J, Ruscio AM. Informing the continuity controversy. A taxometric analysis of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2000; 109:473-487.
25. Trull TJ, Widiger TA, Guthrie P. Categorical versus dimensional status of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1990; 99:40-48.
26. Haslam N, Beck AT. Subtyping major depression: a taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1994; 103:686-692.
27. Keller F. Methoden zur unterscheidung dimensionaler und kategorialer latenter strukturen in der depressionsdiagnostik In: Reinecke J, Tarnai C, eds. Angewandte Klassifikationsanalyse in Den Sozialwissenschaften. Münster: Waxmann, 2000: 178-207.
28. Whisman MA, Pinto A. Hopelessness depression in depressed inpatient adolescents. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1997; 21:345-358.
29. Ambrosini P, Bennett D, Cleland C, Haslam N. Taxonicity of adolescent melancholia. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2002; 36:247-256.
30. Grove WM, Andreasen NC, Young M et al. Isolation and characterization of a nuclear depressive syndrome. Psychological Medicine 1987; 17:471-484.
31. Zimmerman M, Spitzer R. Melancholia: from DSM-III to DSM-III-R. American Journal of Psychiatry 1989; 146:20-28.
32. Schotte CKW, Maes M, Cluydts R, Cosyns P. Cluster analytic validation of the DSM melancholic depression. The threshold model: integration of quantitative and qualitative distinctions between unipolar depressive subtypes. Psychiatry Research 1997; 71:181-195.
33. Meyer T, Keller F. Is there evidence for a latent class called 'hypomanic temperament'? Journal of Affective Disorders 2003; 75:259-267.
34. Ruscio AM, Ruscio J, Keane TM. The latent structure of post-traumatic stress disorder: a taxometric investigation of reactions to extreme stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2002; 111:290-301.
35. Ruscio AM, Borkovec TD, Ruscio JP. A taxometric investigation of the latent structure of worry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2001; 110:413-422.
36. Oakman JM, Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Farvolden P. Toward an improved nosology of social phobia. Dimensional or latent class? Paper presented at the Fifth Internet World Congress on Biomedical Sciences. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University, 1998.
37. Woodward SA, Lenzenweger MF, Kagan J, Snidman N, Arcus D. Taxonic structure of infant reactivity: Evidence from a taxometric perspective. Psychological Science 2000; 11:296-301.
38. Stern HS, Arcus D, Kagan J, Rubin DB, Snidman N. Using mixture models in temperament research. International Journal of Behavioral Development 1995; 18:407-423.
39. Fraley RC, Waller NG. Adult attachment patterns: a test of the typological model. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS, eds. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford, 1998; 77-114.
40. Fraley RC, Spieker SJ. Are infant attachment patterns continuously or categorically distributed? A taxometric analysis of strange situation behavior. Developmental Psychology 2003; 39:387-404.
41. Taylor S, Rabian B, Fedoroff IC. Anxiety sensitivity. Progress, prospects, and challenges. In: Taylor S, ed. Anxiety sensitivity: theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999; 339-353.
42. Gleaves DH, Lowe MR, Snow AC, Green BA, Murphy-Eberenz KP. Continuity and discontinuity models of bulimia nervosa: a taxometric investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2000; 109:56-68.
43. Gleaves DH, Lowe MR, Green BA, Cororve MB, Williams TL. Do anorexia and bulimia nervosa occur on a continuum? A taxometric analysis. Behavior Therapy 2000; 31:195-219.
44. Williamson DA, Womble LG, Smeets MAM et al. The latent structure of eating disorder symptoms: a factor analytic and taxometric investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 159:412-418.
45. Tylka TL, Subich LM. Revisiting the latent structure of eating disorders: taxometric analyses with nonbehavioral indicators. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2003; 50:276-286.
46. Waller NG, Putnam FW, Carlson EB. Types of dissociation and dissociative types: a taxometric analysis of dissociative experiences. Psychological Methods 1996; 3:300-321.
47. Waller NG, Ross CA. The prevalence and biometric structure of pathological dissociation in the general population: taxometric and behavior genetic findings. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1997; 106:499-510.
48. Oakman JM, Woody EZ. A taxometric analysis of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996; 71:980-991.
49. Frischholtz MA. The relationship among dissociation, hypnosis, and child abuse in the developmental of multiple personality disorder. In: Kluft RP, ed. Childhood antecedents of multiple personality disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1985; 99-126.
50. McCrae RR. A reformulation of axis II. Personality and personality related problems. In: Costa PT, Widiger TA, eds. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1994; 303-310.
51. Widiger TA, Clark LA. Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin 2000; 126:946-963.
52. Costa PT, Widiger TA, eds. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Press, 2002.
53. Haslam N. The dimensional view of personality disorders: a review of the taxometric evidence. Clinical Psychology Review 2003; 23:75-93.
54. Blanchard JJ, Gangestad SW, Brown SA, Horan WP. Hedonic capacity and schizotypy revisited: a taxometric analysis of social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2000; 109:87-95.
55. Erlenmeyer-Kimling L, Golden RR, Cornblatt BA. A taxonometric analysis of cognitive and neuromotor variables in children at risk for schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1989; 98:203-208.
56. Keller F, Jahn T, Klein C. Anwendung von taxometrischen methoden und von mischverteilungsmodellen zur erfassung von schizotypie [Application of taxometric methods and mixture distribution models for the assessment of schizotypy]. In: Andresen B, Mass R, eds. Schizotypie. Psychometrische entwicklungen und biopsychologische forschungsansätze. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2001; 391-412.
57. Korfine L, Lenzenweger MF. The taxonicity of schizotypy: a replication. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1995; 104:26-31.
58. Lenzenweger MF. Deeper into the schizotypy taxon: on the robust nature of maximum covariance analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1999; 108:182-187.
59. Lenzenweger MF, Korfine L. Confirming the latent structure and base rate of schizotypy: a taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1992; 101:567-571.
60. Meyer T, Keller F. Exploring the latent structure of the Perceptual Aberration, Magical Ideation and Physical Anhedonia Scales in a German sample - a partial replication. Journal of Personality Disorders 2001; 15:521-535.
61. Tyrka A, Cannon TD, Haslam N et al. The latent structure of schizotypy. I. Premorbid indicators of a taxon of individuals at risk for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1995; 104:173-183.
62. Tyrka A, Haslam N, Cannon TD. Detection of a longitudinally-stable taxon of individuals at risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In: Raine A, Lencz T, Mednick SA, eds. Schizotypal personality disorder. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995; 168-191.
63. Meehl PE. Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist 1965; 17:827-838.
64. Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL. Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994; 62:387-397.
65. Skilling TA, Harris GT, Rice MT, Quinsey VL. Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment 2001; 14:27-38.
66. Skilling TA, Quinsey VL, Craig WM. Evidence of a taxon underlying serious antisocial behavior in boys. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2001; 28:450-470.
67. Rothschild L, Cleland CM, Haslam N, Zimmerman M. A taxometric study of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003; 112: in press.
68. Beauchaine TP. Taxometrics and developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology 2003; 15:501-527.
69. Watson D. Investigating the construct validity of the dissociative taxon: Stability analyses of normal and pathological dissociation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003; 112:298-305.
70. Haertel EH. Continuous and discrete latent structure models for item response data. Psychometrika 1990; 55:477-494.
71. van den Oord EJCG, Pickles A, Waldman ID. Normal variation and abnormality: an empirical study of the liability distributions underlying depression and delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2003; 44:180-192.
72. Beauchaine TP, Beauchaine RJ. A comparison of maximum covariance and k-means cluster analysis in classifying cases into known taxon groups. Psychological Methods 2002; 7:245-261.
73. Maraun MD, Slaney K, Goddyn L. An analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX procedure for the case of dichotomous indicators. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2003; 38:81-112.
74. Ruscio J. Taxometric analysis with dichotomous indicators: The modified MAXCOV procedure and a case removal consistency test. Psychological Reports 2000; 87:929-939.
75. Beauchaine TP, Waters E. Pseudotaxonicity in MAMBAC and MAXCOV analyses of rating scale data: turning continua into classes by manipulating observers' expectations. Psychological Methods 2003; 8:3-15.
76. Widiger TA. What can we learn from taxometric analyses? Clinical Psychology. Science and Practice 2001; 8:528-533.
77. Kessler RC. Epidemiological perspectives for the development of future diagnostic systems. Psychopathology 2002; 35:158-161.
78. Meehl PE. Comorbidity and taxometrics. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2001; 8:507-519.
79. Ruscio J, Ruscio AM. A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment 2002; 9:4-16.
80. Haslam N. Psychiatric categories as natural kinds: essentialist thinking about mental disorder. Social Research 2000; 67:1031-1058.
81. Kripke S. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
82. Zachar P. Psychiatric disorders are not natural kinds. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2000; 7:167-182.
83. Campbell EJM, Scadding JG, Roberts RS. The concept of disease. British Medical Journal 1979; 2:757-762.
84. Scadding JG. Essentialism and nominalism in medicine: logic of diagnosis in disease terminology. Lancet 1996; 348:594-600.
85. Haslam N, Ernst D. Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2002; 21:628-644.