US science education: The view from a practicing scientist

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 635-646

  Altschuld, Ruth A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION;

EID: 0346640232     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1541-1338.2003.00044.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bridgman, M. C. (2002). Some parents in Westerville were wary of changes at high schools. Columbus Dispatch, October 23, E1-E2.
2. Dahms, S. (2002). Foreign scientists seen essential to US biotechnology. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) Today 1(3), 4.
3. Hall, T. (1956). Gifted children: The Cleveland story. Cleveland and New York: World.
4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (2002). FY 2002 funding and operating guidelines. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/nrsa/htm.
5. Mervis, J. (2001). US science education: Lawmakers vie to shape NSF program. Science 292(5521), 1463-1464.
6. Mervis, J. (2002). Science education: US programs ask faculty to help improve schools. Science 295(5553), 265.
7. Recer, P. (2002). Many Americans lack knowledge of elementary science, poll finds. Columbus Dispatch, May 5, B7.
8. Ritter, M. (2002). Scientific literacy / falling behind: American's low scores concern experts. Associated Press, Columbus Dispatch, July 2, A7.