Sorting Mug Shots: Methodological Issues

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 81-96

  Pryke, Sean ^b   Lindsay, R C L ^a   Pozzulo, Joanna D ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346639409     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200001)14:1<81::AID-ACP624>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adachi, K. (1994). Computer-based retrieval of witnessed faces using inter-feature similarity. Japanese Psychological Research, 36, 233-238.
2. Brigham, J. C. and Cairns, D. L. (1988). The effect of mug shot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1394-1410.
3. Brown, E. L., Deffenbacher, K. A. and Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.
4. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K. and Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
5. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., Flin, R. H., Shepherd, J. and Davies, G. M. (1989). Identification from a computer-driven retrieval system compared with a traditional mugshot album search: A new tool for police investigations. Ergonomics, 32, 167-177.
6. Laughery, KR, Alexander, J. F. and Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.
7. Laughery, K. R., Fessier, P. K., Lenorovitz, D. R. and Yoblick, D. A. (1974). Time delay and similarity effects in facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
8. Lee, E. and Whelan, T. (1995). Computerized feature retrieval of images: Suspect identification. Ergonomics, 38, 1941-1957.
9. Lee, E. and Whelan, T. (1996). Feature approaches to suspect identification: Effect of multiple raters on system performance. Ergonomics, 39, 17-34.
10. Levi, A. M., Jungman, N., Glinton, A., Aperman, A. and Noble, G. (1995). Using similarity judgements to conduct a mugshot album search. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 649-661.
11. Lindsay, R. C. L., Nosworthy, G. J., Martin, R. and Martynuck, C. (1994). Using mug shots to find suspects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 121-130.
12. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Pozzulo, J. D. (1994, March). An efficient mugshot sorting technique. American Psychology-Law Society, Santa Fe.
13. Ng, W. J. and Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 217-232.
14. Schooler, J. W. and Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
15. Shepherd, J. W. (1986). An interactive computer system for retrieving faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe and A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 398-409). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
16. Watanabe, S., Adachi, K. and Suzuki, A. (1991). Retrieval of facial images using rating scales with standard stimuli. Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science, Research on Forensic Science, 44, 168-175.
17. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
18. Windschitl, P. D. (1996). Memory for faces: Evidence of retrieval based impairment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1101-1122.
19. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.