Assessing Animal Care and Use Programs Internationally

Lab Animal

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 27-29

  Bayne, Kathryn ^a   Miller, John G ^a  

^a Assoc for Assess and Accreditation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346638680     PISSN: 00937355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Hearn, J.P. Introduction. ILAR Journal; 37(2):55-6, 1995.
2. Bayne, K. and Martin. D. AAALAC International: Using performance standards to evaluate an animal care and use program. Lab Animal; 27(4):32-35, 1998.
3. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
4. AAALAC International. US and European guidelines more alike than different: a side-by-side comparison. Connection; August 1997.
5. Council Directive on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations, and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Regarding the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. European Union, 1986.
6. Acred, P., et al. Guidelines for the welfare of animals in rodent protection tests: A report from the Rodent Protection Test Working Party. Lab Animal; 28:13-8, 1994.
7. Baumans, V., et al. Pain and distress in laboratory rodents and lagomorphs: Report of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) Working Group on Pain and Distress. Lab. Anim.; 28:97-112, 1994.
8. American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Report of the American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine on Adequate Veterinary Care in Research, Testing, and Teaching. 1996.
9. Nevalainen, T., et al. FELASA guidelines for education of specialists in laboratory animal science (Category D). Lab. Anim.; 33:1-15, 1999.
10. Miller, J. International harmonization of animal care and use: The proof is in the practice. Lab Animal; 27(5):28-31, 1998.