Types of child art and alternative developmental accounts: Interpreting the interpreters

Human Development

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 155-168

  Wilson, Brent ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346613463     PISSN: 0018716X     EISSN: 14230054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000278718     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amhcim, R., (1974). Art ami visual perception., Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Arnheim, R., (1978). Expressions., Art Education., 31, 37-38.
3. Bal, M., (1991). Reading RembrandtV Beyond the word-image opposition., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beardsley, M., (1970). The aesthetic point of view., In H.F., Kiefer & ML., Munitz (Eds.). Contemporary philosophic thought., Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Bell, C., (1914). Significant form., In M., Rader A modern book of esthetics., New York: Holt., Rinehart and Winston.
6. Davis, J., (1993, June). On lost artistry; Is the V-shaped development in graphic symbolization unnecessary? Paper presented at the meeting of the Piaget Society., Philadelphia., PA.
7. Gardner, H., (1980). Artful scribbles., New York: Basic Books.
8. Kellogg, R., (1969). Analyzing children's art., Palo Alto., CA: National Press Books.
9. Lowenfeld, V., (1947). Creative and mental growth., New York: Macmillan.
10. Pollock, G., (1993). Review of Mieke Bal., Reading 'Rembrandt' Beyond the word-image opposition., The An Bulletin., Vol LXXV, 529-535.
11. Schodl, F.L., (1983). Manga, manga!: The world of Japanese comics., San Francisco: Kodansha International.
12. Viola, W., (1936). Child an and Fran: Cizek., Vienna: Austrian Junior Red Cross.
13. Weitz, M., (1959). The role of theory in aesthetics., In M., Weitz (Ed.). Problems in aesthetics: An introductory book of readings., New York: Macmillan.
14. Wiedmann, A., (1979). Romantic roots in modern art., Surrey, UK: Gresham Books.
15. Wilson, B., (1992). Primitivism, the avant garde, and the art of little children., In D., Thistlewood (Ed.). Drawing: Research and development., Harlow, UK: Longman.
16. Wilson, B., Hurwitz, A., & Wilson, M., (1987). Teaching drawing from an., Worcester., MA: Davis.
17. Wilson, B., & Ligtvoet, J., (1992). Across time and cultures: Stylistic changes in the drawings of Dutch children., In D., Thistlewood (Ed.). Drawing: Research and development., Harlow., UK: Longman.
18. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M., (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people., Art Education., 10., 4-12.
19. Wilson, B & Wilson, M., (1979). Figure structure, figure action and framing in drawings of American and Egyptian children., Studies in Art Education HI., 33-43.
20. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M., (1981). The case of the disappearing two-eyed profile: Or how little children influence the drawings of little children., Review of Research in Visual Arts Education 15., 1-18.
21. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M., (1982). Teaching children to draw., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Wilson, B & Wilson, M., (1983). Themes and structures in the graphic narratives of American., Australian., Egyptian, and Finnish children: Tales from four cultures., The Journal of Multi-cultural and Cross-cultural Research in Art Education., 1.63-76.
23. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M., (1984). Children's drawings in Egypt: Cultural style acquisition as graphic development., Visual Arts Research., 10.13-26.
24. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M., (1987). Pictorial composition and narrative structure: Themes and the creation of meaning in the drawings of Egyptian and Japanese children., Visual Arts Research, X., 10-21