Spine rehabilitation: Secondary and tertiary nonoperative care

Spine Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 3 SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 28-36

  Mayer, Tom ^a,f   Polatin, Peter ^b   Smith, Barry ^c   Gatchel, Robert ^b   Fardon, David ^d   Herring, Stanley ^e   Smith, Charlotte ^f   Donelson, Ronald ^f   Wong, David ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic   (United States)

^e Puget Sound Sports and Spine Physicians   (United States)

^f Denver Orthopedic Clinic ^*  (United States)

^g Denver Orthopedic Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERVICAL SPINE; CHRONIC PAIN; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SPINE DISEASE; DISABLED PERSON; METHODOLOGY; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REHABILITATION; SPINE INJURY;

DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; PALLIATIVE CARE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; REHABILITATION; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL INJURIES;

EID: 0346552067     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00562-4     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Mayer T, Polatin P, Smith B, et al. Contemporary Concepts in Spine Care: spine rehabilitation: secondary and tertiary nonoperative care. Spine 1995;20:2060-6.
2. Loeser J. Dorsal rhizotomy. Indicators and results. In: Bonica JJ, editor. Advances in neurology: International Symposium on Pain, vol. 4. New York: Raven Press, 1974.
3. Melzack R, Wall P. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965;50:971-9.
4. Beecher H. Relationship of significance of wound to the pain experienced. JAMA 1956;161:1609-13.
5. Sternbach R. Pain: a psychological analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
6. Fordyce W, Fowler R, DeLateur B. An application of behavior modification technique to a problem of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1968;6:105-7.
7. Gottlieb H. Multidisciplinary pain clinics, center, and programs. In: Tollison CD, Kriegel ML, editors. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of low back pain. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.
8. Fordyce W, Steger J. Chronic pain. In: Pomerleau OF, Brady JP, editors. Behavioral medicine: theory and practice. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1979
9. Engleberg A, editor. American Medical Association guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 3rd ed. Chicago: AMA Press, 1988.
10. Davies G, Gould J. Trunk testing using a prototype Cybex II isokinetic stabilization system. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1982;3:164-70.
11. Hasue M, Fujuwara M, Kikuchi S. A new method of quantitative measurement of abdominal back muscle strength. Spine 1980;5:143-8.
12. Langrana N, Lee C, Alexander H. Quantitative assessment of back strength using isokinetic testing. Spine 1984;9:287-90.
13. Loebl W. Measurements of spinal posture and range in spinal movements. Ann Phys Med 1967;9:103.
14. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up: 1985 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences. Spine 1985;10:482-93.
15. Mayer T, Smith S, Kondraske G, Gatchel R, Carmichael T, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function, part 3: preliminary data on isokinetic torso rotation testing with myoelectric spectral analysis in normal and low back pain subjects. Spine 1985;10:912-20.
16. Mayer T, Tencer A, Kristoferson S, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 1984;9:588-95.
17. Smith S, Mayer T, Gatchel R, Becker T. Quantification of lumbar function, part 1: isometric and multi-speed isokinetic trunk strength measures in sagittal and axial planes in normal subject patients. Spine 1985;10:757-64.
18. Thorstensson A, Nilsson J. Trunk muscle strength during constant and velocity movement. Scand J Rehab Med 1982;14:61-8.
19. Chaffin D, Herrin G, Keyserling W. Pre employment strength testing. An updated position. J Occup Med 1978;20:403-8.
20. Kishino N, Mayer T, Gatchel R, et al. Quantification of lumbar function, part 4: isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low back dysfunction patients. Spine 1985;10:921-7.
21. Mayer T, Barnes D, Nichols G, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation, part I: a standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 1988;13:993-7.
22. Mayer T, Barnes D, Nichols G, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation, part II: a comparison with isokinetic in a disabled chronic low back pain industrial population. Spine 1988;13:998-1002.
23. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Barnes D, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation [erratum notice]. Spine 1990;15:5.
24. Troup J, Foreman T, Baxter C, et al. The perception of back pain and the role of psychophysical tests of lifting capacity: 1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences. Spine 1987;7:645-57.
25. NASS Treatment Guidelines Committee. North American Spine Society lumbar spine treatment guidelines. Chicago: NASS Press, 2001.
26. Deyo R. Conservative therapy for low back pain: distinguishing useful from useless therapy. JAMA 1983;250:1057-62.
27. Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Work hardening and work conditioning guidelines. Tuscon, AZ, 2002.
28. Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Chronic pain management guidelines. Tuscon, AZ, 2002.
29. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Mayer H, et al. A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury: an objective assessment procedure. JAMA 1987;258:1763-7.
30. Mayer T, McMahon M, Gatchel R, et al. Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls. Spine 1998;23:598-606.
31. Jordan K, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Should extended disability be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation? Socioeconomic outcomes of early vs. late functional restoration in compensation spinal disorders. Spine 1998;23:2110-7.
32. Wright A, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Outcomes of disabling cervical spine disorders in compensation injuries: a prospective comparison to tertiary rehabilitation response for chronic lumbar spinal disorders. Spine 1999;24:178-83.
33. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Evans T. Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders. Spine 2001;26:1378-84.
34. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Polatin P, editors. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: function, outcomes and evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
35. Mooney V. Nonoperative treatment for postacute spinal and extremity disorders. In: Mayer T, Gatchel R, Polatin P, editors. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: function, outcomes and evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000:409-30.
36. Deschner M, Polatin P. Interdisciplinary programs: chronic pain management. In: Mayer T, Gatchel R, Polatin P, editors. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: function, outcomes and evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000:629-37.
37. Mayer T. Functional restoration of patients with chronic spinal pain. In: Fardon D, Garfin S, editors. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (OKU) Spine 2. Chicago: AAOS Press, 2002: 229-38.
38. Tucker C, Mayer T. Functional restoration of the patient with chronic spine pain. Continuum 2000;7:152-78.
39. Cocchiarella L, Andersson G, editors. American Medical Association guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 5th ed. Chicago: AMA Press, 2000.
40. McKenzie R. The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications, 1981.
41. Long A. The centralization phenomenon: its usefulness as a predictor of outcome in conservative treatment of chroic low back pain. Spine 1995;20:2513-21.
42. Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R, et al. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain: a predictor of symptomatic discs and annular competence. Spine 1997;22:1115-22.
43. Fordyce W, Roberts A, Sternbach R. The behavioral management of chronic pain: a response to critics. Pain 1985;22:113-25.
44. Gottlieb H, Koller R, Alperson B. Low back pain comprehensive rehabilitation program: a follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:458-61.
45. Roberts A, Reinhardt L. The behavioral management of chronic pain: long-term follow-up with comparison groups. Pain 1980;8:151-62.
46. Hazard R, Fenwick J, Kalish S, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support: a one-year perspective study of chronic low back pain patients. Spine 1989;14:157-65.
47. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Kishino N, et al. A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement. Pain 1986;25:53-68.
48. Brady S, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration, part II: isokinetic trunk strength. Spine 1994;18:395-400.
49. Curtis L, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration, part III: isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity. Spine 1994;18:401-5.
50. Kohles S, Barnes D, Gatchel R, et al. Improved physical performance outcomes after functional restoration treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: early versus recent training results. Spine 1990;15:1321-4.
51. Mayer T, Pope P, Tabor J, et al. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration, part I: lumbar mobility. Spine 1994;18:389-94.
52. Garcy P, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling spinal disorders: tertiary prevention efficacy of functional restoration treatment. Spine 1996;21:952-9.
53. Isernhagen S. Functional capacity evaluation and work hardening perspective. In: Mayer T, Mooney V, Gatchel R, editors. Contemporary conservative care for painful spinal disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1991:328-45.
54. Kornblau B. Work hardening in interdisciplinary rehabilitation of low back pain. In: Tollison CD, Kriegel ML, editors. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of low back pain. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.
55. Kankaanpaa M, Taimela S, Airaksinen O, et al. The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Spine 1999;24:1034-42.
56. Taimela S, Diederich C, Hubsch M, et al. The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain: a follow-up study. Spine 2000;25:1809-16.
57. Ryan J, Corry J, Speldewinde G. Endurance framing to be no more effective than physiotherapy or chiropractic treatment in terms of reducing pain and disability or increase muscle strength. Spine 1998;23:2147-9.
58. Holmes B, Leggett S, Mooney V, et al. Comparison of female geriatric lumbar-extension strength: asymptotic versus chronic low back pain patients and their response to active rehabilitation. J Spinal Dis 1996;9:17-22.
59. Mannion AF, Taimela S, Muntener M, et al. Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 1. Effects on back muscle activation, fatigability, and strength. Spine 2001;26:897-908.
60. Mannion AF, Junge A, Taimela S, et al. Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine 2001;26:920-9.
61. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2001;26:262-9.
62. Mannion AF, Muntener M, Taimela S, et al. A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 1999;24:2435-48.
63. Torstensen TA, Ljunggren AE, Meen HD, et al. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine 1998;23:2616-24.
64. Sobaszek A, Fantoni-Quinton S, Delval M, et al. Long-term assessment of a sanitary education and lumbar rehabilitation program for health care workers with chronic low back pain at the University Hospital of Lille. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43:289-94.
65. Taimela S, Harkapaa K. Strength, mobility, their changes, and pain reduction in active functional restoration for chronic low back disorders. J Spinal Dis 1996;9:306-12.
66. Bendix A, Bendix T, Labriola M, et al. Functional restoration for chronic low back pain. Two-year follow-up of two randomized clinical trials. Spine 1998;23:717-25.
67. Rainville J, Sobel J, Hartigan C, et al. The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. Spine 1997;22:2016-24.
68. Rose MJ, Reilly JP, Pennie B, et al. Chronic low back pain rehabilitation programs: a study of the optimum duration of treatment and a comparison of group and individual therapy. Spine 1997;22:2246-3.
69. Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter M. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997;22:2128-56.
70. Dersh J, Gatchel R, Polatin P. Chronic spinal disorders and psychopathology: research findings and theoretical considerations. Spine J 2001;1:88-94.
71. Cook T, Campbell D. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issue for field studies. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.
72. Newton M, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines, part 1: review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine 1993;7:801-11.
73. Waddell G, Somerville D, Henderson I, et al. Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine 1992;17:617-28.
74. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, et al. A male incumbent worker industrial database, part I: lumbar spinal physical capacity. Spine 1994;19:755-61.
75. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, et. al. A male incumbent worker industrial database, part II: cervical spinal physical capacity. Spine 1994;19:762-4.
76. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, et al. A male incumbent worker industrial database, part III: lumbar/cervical functional testing. Spine 1994;19:765-70.
77. Ng J, Kippers V, Richardson C, et al. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine 2001;26:53-60.
78. Lea R, Gerhardt J. Current concepts review: range of motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77A:784-98.
79. Dvorak J, Vajda E, Grob D, et al. Normal motion of the lumbar spine as related to age and gender. Eur Spine J 1995;4:18-23.