The detection of semantic illusions: Task-specific effects for similarity and position of distorted terms

Psychological Research

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 219-230

  Van Jaarsveld, Henk J ^a   Dijkstra, Ton ^b   Hermans, Daan ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346540821     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00439299     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnan, & T. G., Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance. Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives, (pp. 155-205). New York: Academic Press.
2. Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477-487.
3. Bredart, S., & Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67, 135-144.
4. Epstein, W., Glenberg, A. M., & Bradley, M. M. (1984). Coactivation and comprehension: Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory and Cognition, 12, 355-360.
5. Erickson, T. D. & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540-551.
6. Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1994). In search of complete comprehension: Getting "Minimalists", to work. Discourse Processes, 18, 271-296.
7. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702-718.
8. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597-602.
9. Graesser, A. C., McMahen, C. L., & Johnson, B. K. (1994). Question asking and answering. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 517-538). Academic Press, New York.
10. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
11. Oostendorp, H. van, & Kok, I. (1990). Failing to notice errors in sentences. Language and Cognitive processes, 5, 105-113.
12. Oostendorp, H. van, & Mul, S. de. (1990). Moses beats Adam: A semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 74, 35-46.
13. Reder, L.M., & Cleeremans, A. (1990). The role of partial matches in comprehension: The Moses illusion revisited. In A.C. Graesser & G.H. Bower (Eds.) The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol 25. Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 233-258). London: Academic Press.
14. Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 385-406.
15. Robertson, S. P., Ullman, J., & Mehta, A. (1992). Simultaneous question comprehension and answer retrieval. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Robertson, S. P., Weber, K., Ullman, J., & Mehta, A. (1993). Parallel question parsing and memory retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 155-168.
17. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1994). Selective processing in text understanding. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 699-719). New York: Academic Press.
18. Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some Qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 141-154.