The development of an intervening opportunities model with spatial dominance effects

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 69-86

  Akwawua, Siaw ^a   Pooler, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision makers; Distance; Dominance; Intervening opportunities; Migration flows; Primate cities; Spatial theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346526036     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00011468     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baxter RS (1976) Computer and statistical techniques for planners. Methuen, London
2. Baxter MJ (1983) Estimation and inference in spatial interaction models. Progress in Human Geography 7:40-59
3. Baxter MJ, Ewing GO (1979) Calibration of production-constrained trip distribution models and the effect of intervening opportunities. Journal of Regional Science 19(3):319-330
4. Fader PS, McAlister L (1990) An elimination by aspects model of consumer response to promotion calibrated on UPC scanner data. Journal of Marketing Research 27:322-32
5. Fik TJ, Mulligan GF (1990) Spatial flows and competing central places: Towards a general theory of hierarchical interaction. Environment and Planning A 22:527-549
6. Fik TJ, Amey RG, Mulligan GF (1992) Labor migration amongst hierarchically competing and intervening origins and destinations. Environment and Planning A 24(9):1271-1290
7. Foerster JF (1979) Model choice decision process models: a comparison of compensatory and non-compensatory structures. Transportation Research 13A:17-28
8. Fotheringham AS (1983) A new set of spatial interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A 15:15-36
9. Fotheringham AS (1984) Spatial flows and spatial patterns. Environment and Planning A 16:529-543
10. Fotheringham AS (1988) Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Marketing Science 7:299-310
11. Fotheringham AS, O'Kelly ME (1989) Spatial interaction models: Formulations and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
12. Gensch DH, Svestka JA (1979) An exact hierarchical algorithm for determining aggregate statistics from individual choice data. Management Science 25(10):939-952
13. Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1987) Analytical behavioral geography. Croom Helm, London
14. Gonçalves MB, Ulysséa-Neto I (1993) The development of a new gravity-opportunity model for trip distribution. Environment and Planning A 25:817-826
15. Gordon IR (1985) Economic explanations of spatial variation in distance deterrence. Environment and Planning A 17:59-72
16. Harris B (1964) A note on the probability of interaction at a distance. Journal of Regional Science 5(2):31-35
17. Haynes KE, Fotheringham AS (1984) Gravity and spatial interaction models. Sage, Beverly Hills
18. Haynes KE, Good DH, Dignan T (1988) Discrete spatial choice and the axiom of independence from irrelevant alternatives. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 22(6):241-251
19. Haynes KE, Machunda ZB (1988) Decomposition of change in spatial employment concentration: an information-theoretic extension of shift-share analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 65:101-113
20. Haynes KE, Poston DL, Schnirring P (1973) Intermetropolitan migration in high and low opportunity areas: indirect tests of the distance and intervening opportunities hypothesis. Economic Geography 49(1):68-73
21. Heanue KE, Pyers CE (1966) A comparative evaluation of trip distribution procedures. Highway Research Record 114:20-50
22. Huff JO (1976) A hierarchical migration model of population redistribution within a central place hierarchy. Geographical Analysis 8:231-254
23. Hutchenson K (1970) A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29:151-154
24. Jayet R (1990) Spatial search processes and spatial interaction: 1. Sequential search, intervening opportunities, and spatial search equilibrium. Environment and Planning A 22:583-599
25. Johnston EJ, Meyer RJ, Ghose S (1989) When choice models fail: Compensatory models in negatively correlated environments. Journal of Marketing Research 24:255-70
26. Knudsen DC, Fotheringham AS (1986) Matrix comparison, goodness-of-fit, and spatial interaction modelling. International Regional Science Review 10(2):127-147
27. Kitamura R (1984) Sequential model of interdependent activity and destination choices. Transportation Research Record 987:81-89
28. Lo L (1992) Destination interdependence and the competing-destinations model. Environment and Planning A 24:1191-1204
29. Luce RD (1959) Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Wiley, New York
30. Oppenheim N (1980) Applied models in urban and regional analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliff, NJ
31. Okabe A (1976) A theoretical comparison of the opportunity and gravity models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 6:381-397
32. Plane DA, Rogerson PA (1986) Dynamic flow modeling with interregional dependency effects: An application to structural change in the U.S. migration system. Demography 23(1):91-104
33. Pooler J (1992) Spatial uncertainty and spatial dominance in interaction modelling: a theoretical perspective on spatial competition. Environment and Planning A 24:995-1008
34. Pyers CE (1965) Evaluation of intervening opportunities trip distribution model. Highway Research Record 114:71-98
35. Raphael S (1998) Intervening opportunities, competing searchers, and the intrametropolitan flow of male youth labor. Journal of Regional Science 38(1):43-59
36. Roy JR (1985) On forecasting choice among dependent spatial alternatives. Environment and Planning A 12:479-492
37. Roy JR (1993) Comment on "The development of a new gravity-opportunity model for trip distribution". Environment and Planning A 25:1689-1691
38. Ruiter ER (1967) Towards a better understanding of the intervening opportunities model. Transportation Research 1:47-56
39. Schneider M (1959) Gravity models and trip distribution theory. Papers of the Regional Science Association 5:51-58
40. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27:379-423 and 623-656
41. Slater P (1985) Point-to-point migration functions and gravity model renormalization: approaches to aggregation in spatial interaction modeling. Environment and Planning A 17:1025-1044
42. Smith SL (1980) Intervening opportunities and travel to urban recreation centers. Journal of Leisure Research 12(4):296-308
43. Smith DP, Hutchinson BC (1981) Goodness-of-fit statistics for trip distribution models. Transportation Research 15A:295-303
44. Stouffer SA (1940) Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance. American Sociological Review 5:845-867
45. Stouffer SA (1960) Intervening opportunities and competing migrants. Journal of Regional Science 2:1-26
46. Thomas RW (1977) An interpretation of the journey-to-work on Merseyside using entropy-maximizing methods. Environment and Planning A 9:817-834
47. Timmermans H, van der Waerden P (1992) Modelling sequential choice processes: the case of two-stop trip chaining. Environment and Planning A 24:1483-1490
48. Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: a theory of consumer choice. Psychological Review 79:281-299
49. White P, Woods R (1980) The geographical impact of migration. Longman, London
50. Wills MJ (1986) A flexible gravity-opportunity model for trip distribution. Transportation Research B 20B(2):89-111
51. Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of trip distribution models. Transportation Research 1:253-269
52. Wilson AG (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion, London
53. Wilson AG (1974) Urban and regional models in geography and planning. Wiley, New York
54. Wilson AG, Bennett RJ (1985) Mathematical methods in human geography and planning. Wiley, Chichester
55. Young W (1984) A non-trade-off decision making model of residential location. Transportation Research 18A(1):1-11