R&d and productivity in german manufacturing firms

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 29-50

  Harhoff, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Innovation; Productivity; Research and development

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346513257     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599800000012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brockhoff, K., 1986. Die Produktivitat der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Industrieunternehmens. Zeitschriftfur Betriebswirtschaft, 56: 525–537.
2. Brockhoff, K. and K. Warschkow (1991) Deflationierung industrieller Forschungs-und Entwicklungsaufwendungen. Unpublished Final Repot to the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft), DFG Project Br31/22–1. Kiel.
3. Cuneo, P, and Mairesse, J., 1984. “ Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing ”. In R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., 375–392. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Goto, A, and and K, Suzuki. 1989. R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics., 71 (4): 555–564.
5. Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92–116.
6. Griliches, Z., 1986. Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970Os. American Economic Review, 76 (I): 141–154.
7. Griliches, Z., and Mairesse, J., 1984. “ Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level ”. In R&D. Patents, and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., 339–374. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Hall, B., 1993. Industrial R&D During the 1980s: Did the Rate of Return Fall?. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Microeconomics),: 289–343.
9. Hall, B., and Mairesse, J., 1995. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journol of Econometrics, 65: 263–293.
10. Harhoff, D. (1994) ‘R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms', ZEW Discussion Paper No. 94–01, Zentrum fur Europaische Wirtschaftforschung, Mannheim.
11. Klette, T. and Z. Griliches (1992) ‘The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous.' NBER Working Paper No. 4026, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
12. Klette, T. J., 1994. “ R&D, scope economies and company structure: a ‘not so fixed effect ”. In model of plant performance mimeo
13. Legler, H., Grupp, H., Gehrke, B., and Schasse, U., 1992. Innovationspotetial und Hochrechtnologie, Heidelbcrg: Physica.
14. Mairesse, J., 1992. “ Time-series and cross-sectional estimates on panel data: why are they different and why should they be equal? ”. In Panel Data and Labor Market Studies, Edited by: Hartog, J., Ridder, G., and Theeuwes, J., Amsterdam: North Holland.
15. Mairesse, J., and Hall, B., 1994. “ Comparing the Productivity of Research and Development in French and United States Manufacturing Firms ”. mimeo
16. Mairesse, J., and Sassenou, M., 1991. R&D and Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Finn Level. Science-Technology-Industry Review,: 317–348.
17. Mairesse, J., and Mohnen, P., 1994. R&D and Productivity Growth: What have we learned from Econometric Studies. Paper Presented at the Conference on Evolutionary Economics of Technological Change, Strasbourg. Oct6–81994.
18. National Science Foundation. 1995. National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1994, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
19. Statistisches Bundesamt. 1989. Fachserie 18, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.