Assessment of common turbulence models for an idealised adverse pressure gradient flow

European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 319-337

  Yorke, C P ^a   Coleman, G N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECELERATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REYNOLDS NUMBER; STRAIN;

DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION (DNS); MODEL ACCURACY; PRESSURE GRADIENT FLOW; SKIN FRICTION;

TURBULENCE;

EID: 0346512290     PISSN: 09977546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2003.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Coleman G.N., Kim J., Spalart P.R. Direct numerical simulation of decelerated wall-bounded shear flows. Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows. September 1997;. 33-1-33.6.
2. G.N. Coleman, J. Kim, P.R. Spalart, Direct numerical simulation of a decelerated wall-bounded turbulent shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. (2003) in press.
3. Menter F.R. Performance of popular turbulence models for attached and separated adverse pressure gradient flows. AIAA J. 30:1992;2066-2072.
4. Coleman G.N., Kim J., Spalart P.R. A numerical study of strained three-dimensional wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 416:2000;75-116.
5. Spalart P.R., Watmuff J.H. Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 249:1993;337-371.
6. Nagano Y., Tsuji T., Houra T. Structure of turbulent boundary layer subjected to adverse pressure gradient. Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows. September 1997;. 33-7-33.12.
7. Alving A.E., Fernholz H.H. Mean-velocity scaling in and around a mild, turbulent separation bubble. Phys. Fluids. 7:1995;1956-1969.
8. Kays W.M., Crawford M.E. Convective Heat and Mass Transfer. Third edition: 1993;McGraw-Hill.
9. B.S. Baldwin, H. Lomax, Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows, AIAA Paper 78-257, 1978.
10. Wilcox D.C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. Second edition: 1998;DCW Industries.
11. Spalart P., Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Rech. Aèrospat. 1:1994;5-21.
12. J.E. Bardina, P.G. Huang, T.J. Coakley, Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development, NASA Tech. Memo. 110446, April 1997.
13. Launder B.E., Sharma B.I. Application of the energy dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Lett. Heat Mass Transfer. 1:1974;131-138.
14. Menter F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32:1994;1598-1605.
15. Johnson D.A. Transonic separated flow predictions with an eddy-viscosity/Reynolds-stress closure model. AIAA J. 25:1987;252-259.
16. Wilcox D.C. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 26:1988;1299-1310.
17. Jones W.P., Launder B.E. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 15:1972;301-314.
18. Chien K.-Y. Predictions of channel and boundary-layer flows with a low-Reynolds-number turbulence model. AIAA J. 20:1982;33-38.
19. Cebeci T., Smith A.M.O. Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers. 1974;Academic Press.
20. B.S. Baldwin, T.J. Barth, A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows, AIAA Paper 91-0610, 1991.
21. Fares E., Schröder W. A differential equation for approximate wall distance. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 39:2002;743-762.
22. Durbin P.A., Pettersson Reif B.A. Statistical Theory and Modeling for Turbulent Flows. 2001;Wiley.
23. R.M. Halleen, J.P. Johnston, The influence of rotation on flow in a long rectangular channel - an experimental study, Report No. MD-18, Dept. Mech. Engrg., Stanford University, CA, 1967.
24. Dean R.B. Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two-dimensional rectangular duct flow. J. Fluid Engrg. 100:1978;215-223.
25. Michelassi V., Rodi W., Zhu W. Testing a low Reynolds number k - ε turbulence model based on direct numerical simulation data. AIAA J. 31:1993;1720-1723.
26. Schlichting H. Boundary-Layer Theory. Seventh edition: 1979;McGraw-Hill.
27. Hu Z.W., Sandham N.D. Large-domain simulations of Couette and Poiseuille flow. Lindborg E., et al. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, KTH, Sweden. June 2001;377-382.
28. Coleman G.N., Kim J., Spalart P.R. Reynolds-stress budgets from a wall-bounded adverse-pressure-gradient flow. Dopazo C., et al. Advances in Turbulence VIII - Proceedings of the Eighth European Turbulence Conference. June 2000;415-418.
29. D.M. Driver, Reynolds shear stress measurements in a separated boundary layer, AIAA Paper 91-1787, 1991.
30. T.L. Holst, Viscous transonic airfoil workshop. Compendium of results, AIAA Paper 91-1787, 1987.
31. t-92 turbulence model for shear-free and stagnation point flow. J. Fluids Engrg. 123:2001;11-15.
32. A.N. Secundov, Personal communication, 1997.
33. McD. Galbraith R.A., Sjolander S., Head M.R. Mixing length in the wall region of turbulent boundary layers. Aeronaut. Quart. 28:1977;97-110.
34. Huang P.G., Bradshaw P. Law of the wall for turbulent flows in pressure gradients. AIAA J. 33:1995;624-632.