BRST quantization of gauge theory in noncommutative geometry: Matrix derivative approach

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 3725-3738

  Lee, Chang Yeong ^a   Hwang, Dae Sung ^a   Ne'eman, Yuval ^b,c  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346511008     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.531598     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Lett. B 81, 190 (1979); for a different approach also see D. B. Fairlie, ibid. 97 (1979).
2. Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Lett. B 81, 190 (1979); for a different approach also see D. B. Fairlie, ibid. 97 (1979).
3. Y. Ne'eman and J. Thierry-Mieg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 720 (1980).
4. Y. Ne'eman and J. Thierry-Mieg, in Proceedings of the Salamanca (1979) International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics, edited by A. Perez-Rendon, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 836 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
5. Y. Ne'eman and J. Thierry-Mieg, Phys. Lett. B 108, 399 (1982).
6. Y. Ne'eman and S. Sternberg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7875 (1990).
7. C. Y. Lee and Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Lett. B 264, 389 (1991); 269, 477 (1991).
8. C. Y. Lee and Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Lett. B 264, 389 (1991); 269, 477 (1991).
9. A. Connes, in The Interface of Mathematics and Particle Physics, edited by D. Quillen, G. Segal, and S. Tsou (Oxford University, Oxford, 1990).
10. A. Connes and J. Lott, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 18B, 29 (1990).
11. A. H. Chamseddine, G. Felder, and J. Fröhlich, Nucl. Phys. B 395, 672 (1993).
12. A. H. Chamseddine, G. Felder, and J. Fröhlich, Commun. Math. Phys. 155, 205 (1993).
13. A. H. Chamseddine, "Connection between space-time supersymmetry and non-commutative geometry," hep-th/ 9404138.
14. R. Coquereaux, G. Esposito-Farèse, and G. Vaillant, Nucl. Phys. B 353, 689 (1991).
15. R. Häußling, N. A. Papadopoulos, and F. Scheck, Phys. Lett. B 260, 125 (1991).
16. D. Quillen, Topology 24, 89 (1985).
17. N. A. Papadopoulos, J. Plass, and F. Scheck, preprint MZ-TH/93-26, 1993.
18. D. S. Hwang, C. Y. Lee, and Y. Ne'eman, to appear in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A.
19. J. Thierry-Mieg, J. Math. Phys. 21, 2834 (1980). For a doubled fiber bundle structure, see M. Quiros, F. J. De Urries, J. Hoyos, M. L. Mazou, and E. Rodriguez, ibid. 22, 1767 (1981) and the next reference.
20. J. Thierry-Mieg, J. Math. Phys. 21, 2834 (1980). For a doubled fiber bundle structure, see M. Quiros, F. J. De Urries, J. Hoyos, M. L. Mazou, and E. Rodriguez, ibid. 22, 1767 (1981) and the next reference.
21. J. Thierry-Mieg and Y. Ne'eman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 7068 (1982).
22. L. Baulieu and J. Thierry-Mieg, Nucl. Phys. B 197, 477 (1982).
23. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 33, 173 (1971); 35, 167 (1971).
24. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 33, 173 (1971); 35, 167 (1971).
25. K. Fujikawa, B. W. Lee, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 6, 2923 (1972).
26. T. Eguchi, P. Gilkey, and A. Hanson, Phys. Rep. 66, 213 (1980).
27. D. S. Hwang and T. Lee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 5531 (1994).
28. In Ref. 16, we calculated the quantum correction of the mass ratio without introducing the notion of the matrix derivative in the superconnection approach. The result showed a change in the ratio.
29. R. Coquereaux, G. Esposito-Farèse, and F. Scheck, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7, 6555 (1992).