Community justice initiatives: Issues and challenges in the U.S. Context

Federal Probation

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 28-32

  Altschuler, David M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346507828     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altschuler, D. M. (1999). Trends and issues in the adultification of juvenile justice. In P. M. Harris (Ed.), Research to results: Effective community corrections (pp. 233-271). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
2. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
3. Barajas, E., Jr. (1995). Moving toward community justice. Topics in community corrections. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
4. Bazemore, G. (1994). Developing a victim orientation for community corrections: A restorative justice paradigm and a balanced mission, Perspectives, 18(3), 19-24.
5. Bazemore, G., & Griffiths, C. T. (1997). Conferences, circles, boards, and mediations: The "new wave" of community justice decisionmaking. Federal Probation, 61(2), 25-37.
6. Bazemore, G., & Maloney, D. (1994). Rehabilitating community service: Toward restorative service sanctions in a balanced justice system. Federal Probation, 58(1), 24-35.
7. Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (1996).Community justice/restorative justice: Prospects for a new social ecology for community corrections. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(2), 311-334.
8. Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41(3), 296-316.
9. Berrien, J., & Winship, C. (1999). Lessons learned from Boston's police-community collaboration. Federal Probation, 63(2), 25-32.
10. Clear, T. R. (1988). Statistical prediction in corrections. Research in Corrections, 1(1), 1-39.
11. Clear, T. R. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Clear, T. R., & Hardyman, P. L. (1990). The new intensive supervision movement. Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 42-60.
13. Community Policing Consortium. (1994). Understanding community policing: A framework for action. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice.
14. Correctional Service Canada. (1989). What does type of offense tell us about recidivism? Forum on Corrections Research, 1(2), 3-4.
15. Elias, R. (1993). Victims still: The political manipulation of crime victims. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Freivalds, P. (1996, July). Balanced and restorative justice project. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Fact Sheet.
17. Goldcamp, J., & Gottfredson, M. (1985). Policy guidelines for bail: An experiment in court reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
18. Griffiths, C. T., & Hamilton, R. (1996). Spiritual renewal, community revitalization and healing: Experience in traditional aboriginal justice in Canada. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(2), 289-311.
19. Juvenile Justice Update. (1996). Pennsylvania makes fundamental changes to juvenile court by implementing balanced approach. 2(2), 14.
20. Juvenile Justice Update. (1999). Illinois juvenile justice system adopts BARJ model. 5(3), 1-15.
21. Levrant, S., Cullen, F. T., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1999). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benevolence revisited? Crime & Delinquency, 45(1), 3-27.
22. McGillis, D., & Mullen, J. (1977). Neighborhood justice centers: An analysis of potential models. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
23. National Institute of Justice. (1996a). National symposium on restorative justice proceedings, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
24. National Institute of Justice. (1996b). Communities mobilizing against crime: Making partnerships work. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
25. Neithercutt, M. G., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1974). Caseload size variation and differences in probation/parole performance. Washington, DC: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
26. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1997). Juvenile justice reform initiatives in the states: 1994-1996. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
27. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1998). Guide for implementing the balanced and restorative justice model. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
28. Rottman, D. B. (1996). Community courts: Prospects and limits in community justice. National Institute of Justice Journal, 231, 46-51.
29. Schafer, S. (1976). The victim and correctional theory: Integrating victim reparation with offender rehabilitation. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.), Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 227-236). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. nd Ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Umbreit, M. S., & Coates, R. B. (1999). Multicultural implications of restorative juvenile justice. Federal Probation, 63(2), 44-51.
32. Van Ness, D. W. (1986). Crime and its victims. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
33. Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (1997). Restoring justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
34. Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.