Academic workload planning revisited

Higher Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 215-233

  Burgess, T F ^a   Lewis, H A ^b   Mobbs, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic workload planning; Departmental planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346496322     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024787907547     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1967). 'Management misinformation myths', Management Science 14(4), B147-B156.
2. Anon. (1999). Transparency Review of Research: Proposal for a New Uniform Approach to the Costing of Research and other Activities in Universities and Colleges of Higher Education. Bristol: JM Consulting Ltd.
3. Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
4. Bull, G.M., Dallinga-Hunter, C., Epelboin, Y., Frackman, E. and Jennings, D. (1994). Information Technology: Issues for Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
5. Burgess, T.F. (1996). 'Planning the academic's workload: different approaches to allocating work to university academics', Higher Education 32, 63-75.
6. Davis, G.B. and Olson, M.H. (1985). Management Information Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
7. Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L. (1960). 'Sociotechnical systems', in Churchman, C.W. and Verhulst, M.C. (eds.), Management Science, Models and Techniques, Vol 2. Pergamon Press.
8. Finlay, P.N. and Gregory, C. (1994). 'A management support system for directing and monitoring the activities of university staff', Journal of the Operational Research Society 45, 641-650.
9. Golden, B.R., Dukerich, J.M. and Fabian, F.H. (2000). 'The interpretation and resolution of resource allocation issues in professional organizations: a critical examination of the professional-manager dichotomy', Journal of Management Studies 37(8), 1157-1187.
10. Gourley, B. (2001). 'Watch out for scavengers', Times Higher Education Supplement, 20th April, p. 10.
11. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
12. Higson, H., Filby, J. and Golder, V. (1998). 'A critique of a model for an academic staff activity database developed to aid a department in strategic and operational decision-making', Perspectives 2(1), 28-32.
13. Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P. (1998). Management Information Systems: New Approaches to Organization and Technology. Uppers Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
14. Leeds AUT (2001). Statement on University Workloads Policy. Leeds Association of University Teachers, 17th September.
15. Marcus, L.R. (1999). 'The micropolitics of planning', The Review of Higher Education 23(1), 45-64.
16. McAuley, J., Duberley, J. and Cohen, L. (2000). 'The meaning professionals give to management ... and strategy', Human Relations 53(1), 87-116.
17. Monbiot, G. (2000). Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain. London: Macmillan.
18. Nichoson, T.A.J. (1989). 'Planning and managing capacity', in Wild, R. (ed.), International Handbook of Production and Operations Management. London: Cassell Education, pp. 77-88.
19. Salinger, D. (2002). 'AUT Council Report', in Leeds AUT Newsletter. Leeds Association of University Teachers.
20. Sauve, P. and Stern, R.M. (eds.) (2000). GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Washington: Brookings Institute Press.
21. Scott, P. (1995). The Meanings of Mass Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
22. Simon, H.A. (1960). The New Science of Management Decision. New York: Harper and Row.
23. Stowell, F., West, D. and Stansfield, M. (1997). 'Action research as a framework for IS research', in Mingers, J. and Stowell, F. (eds.), Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, pp. 159-200.
24. Stringer, E.T. (1999). Action Research. Sage Publications.