Different implication of control mechanisms in the random and regular shift of mental set;Diferente participación de los mecanismos de control en el cambio entre tareas regular frente al cambio al azar

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 111-117

  Tornay, Francisco J ^a   Milán, Emilio G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346490592     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M.I. Posner (ed.). Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions?. A critical review of 25 years. En D.E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (eds.). Attention and Performance XIV: A silver jubilee. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Allport, A., Styles, E., y Hsieh, S-L. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. En C. Umiltá and M. Moscovitch (eds.), Attention and Performance, 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Baddeley, A. (1986): Working Memory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., Kawski, S., Kluwe, R.H. y Luna, A. (1998). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of cues on switching tasks. X congress of ESCOP. Jerusalem.
6. Gilden, D.L., Schumuckler, A. y Clayton, K. (1993). The perception of natural contour. Psychological Review. 100(3), 460-478.
7. Gilden, D. L. y Wilson, S.G. (1995). On the nature of streaks in signal detection. Cognitive Psychology 28 (1), 17-64.
8. Gopher, D., Armony, L. y Greenspan, Y. (1998). Switching tasks and attention policies and the ability to prepare for such shifts. X congress of ESCOP. Jerusalem.
9. James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover, 1950.
10. Jersild, A.T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of psychology, 89.
11. Los, S.A. (1994). On the origin of mixing costs. Doctoral thesis. Free University of Amsterdam.
12. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and cognition, 2, 6, 1423-1442.
13. Milán, E. G. y Tornay, F. J. (1999). Cambio dinámico de la preparación para realizar una tarea cognitiva: pruebas a favor de una operación de control del procesamiento. Cognitiva, 11, 2, 199-214.
14. Milán, E. G., Tornay, F., Tudela, P, y Madrid, E. (1998). Attention, intention and action. X congress of the ESCOP. Jerusalem
15. Norman, D. A. y Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. Center for Human Information Processing Technical Report, No. 99. San Diego.
16. Norman, D.A. y Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (eds.). Consciousness and self-regulation, 4, 1-18. New York: Plenum.
17. Rogers, R.D y Monsell, S. (1995). Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 2, 207-231.
18. Rueda, M., Tudela, P., y Lupian̄ez, J. (2000). Efecto de facilitación semántica en la tarea Stroop. Implicaciones para el estudio del control atencional. Psicothema, 12 (2), 216-227.
19. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
20. Tudela, P. (1992). Atención. En J. L. F. Trespalacios y P. Tudela (eds), Atención y Percepción, (cap.4), Madrid: Alhambra.