Attributions to ambiguous interaction situations from the point of view of the target and the perpetrator;Atribuciones a situaciones de interacción ambiguas: El punto de vista de la víctima y del agente del prejuicio

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 557-562

  Quiles, María Nieves ^a   Leyens, J Ph ^b   Rodríguez, Armando ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346490524     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2. Brown, R. (1995/1998). Prejuicio. Su Psicología Social. Madrid: Alianza.
3. Crocker, J. Y Major, B. (1989). Social y stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
4. Feldman Barret, L. Y Swin, J. (1998). Appraisal of prejudice and discrimination. En J.K. Swin y Ch. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice. The target's perspective (pp.11-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Inman, : L. Y Baron, R. S. (1996). Influences of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 727-739.
6. Inman, M. L., Huerta, J. Y Oh, S. (1999). Perceiving discrimination: The role of prototypes and norm violation. Social Cognition, 16, 418-450.
7. Katz, I. , Wackenhut, J. Y Hass, R.G. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. En J.F. Dovidio y S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando: Academic Press.
8. Kleck, R. E. y Strenta, A. (1980). Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical caracteristics on social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 861-873.
9. Kramer, R. M. (1998). Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and acting, in the shadow of doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 251-275.
10. Lazarus, R. S. y Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Nueva York: Springer.
11. Leyens, J. Ph., Paladino, P., Rodríguez, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S. Rodríguez, A., y Gaunt, R. (2000). The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Intergroups anad Outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197.
12. Leyens, J. Ph., Rodríguez, A., Rodríguez, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, P., Vaes, J. Y Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 00, 1-17.
13. Mathiews, A. y MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25-50.
14. Major, B. Y Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. En D.M. Mackie y D.L Hamilton (Eds.) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in intergroup perception (pp. 345-370). Nueva York: Academic Press.
15. Medin, D., Alton, M. y Murphy, T. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 333-352.
16. Pettigrew, T. y Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.
17. Pettigrew, T. Y Meertens, R. W. (1995), Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25,1, 57-76.
18. Rodríguez, A. y Quiles, M. (en prensa). Las actitudes y los estereotipos en Canarias. La Laguna: Centro de la Cultura Popular.
19. Ruggiero, K .M. y Taylor, D. M. (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 826-838.
20. Ruggiero, K. M. Y Taylor, D.M. (1997). Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: The role of self-esteem and perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 373-389.
21. Ruggiero, K. M. Y Major, B.N. (1998). Group status and attributions to discrimination: Are low-or hight-status group members more likely to blame their failure on discrimination?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, pp.821-837.
22. Swin, J. K., Cohen, L.L. y Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice. En J. K. Swin y C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective.San Diego: Academic Press.
23. Vonk, R. (1999). Effects of outcome dependency on correspondence bias. Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 382-389.