NEO scientific and policy developments, 1995-2000

Space Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 213-218

  Remo, John L ^a   Haubold, Hans J ^b  

^a HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^b UNITED NATIONS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346487403     PISSN: 02659646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0265-9646(01)00022-4     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Remo J.L. Policy perspectives from the UN international conference on near-earth objects. Space Policy. 12:1996;13-17.
2. Remo JL, Spahr T, Williams GV, Marsden BG. The geographical representation of big and small near-Earth asteroid (NEA) discoveries and observations, 2001, in preparation
3. British National Space Centre. Report of the Task Force on Potentially Hazardous Near Earth Objects. London, 2000, p. 56.
4. Government response to the report of the task force on potentially hazardous near Earth objects. Crown Copyright: //www.dti.gov.uk/DTI/Pub/02/01/NP, 24 February 2001.
5. Marsden BG. A discourse on 1997 XF11. Journal of British Interplanetary Society 1999;195-202.
6. Gehrels T, editor. Hazards due to comets and asteroids. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1994.
7. Remo J.L. Classifying and modeling NEO material properties and interactions. Gehrels T. Hazards due to comets and asteroids. 1994;551-596 Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
8. Remo J.L. Energy requirements, payload masses for near-Earth objects hazard mitigation. Acta Astranautica. 47:1999;35-50.
9. United Nations. Report on the Third United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. United Nations Document A/CONF.184/6, New York, 1999.
10. Dresden M, Kramers HA. Between tradition and revolution. In: Obligation and duty, vol. 4, 1987. p. 501-5. (chapter 18).