Bridging the Gap between Archaeology and the Physical Sciences

Hyperfine Interactions

Volumn 150, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 7-11

  Hayashida, F ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyses of artefacts; Archaeology; Archaeometry; Typology

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARCHEOLOGY; ARTIFACT; CULTURAL FACTOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCE; NOMENCLATURE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY; TRAINING;

EID: 0346459964     PISSN: 03043843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:HYPE.0000007174.27143.85     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Hodder, I. and Preucel, R., Contemporary Archaeology in Theory, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1996.
2. Sillar, B. and Tite, M. S., The Challenge of Technological Choices for Materials Science Approaches to Archaeology, Archaeometry 42(1) (2000), 2-20.
3. Hayashida, F., Style, Technology, and Administered Production: The Manufacture of Inka Pottery in the Leche Valley, Peru, Latin American Antiquity 10(4) (1999), 337-352.
4. Hayashida, F., Häusler, W., Riederer, J. and Wagner, U., Technology and Organisation of Inka Pottery Production in the Leche Valley. Part II: Study of Fired Vessels, In: U. Wagner (ed.), Mössbauer Spectroscopy in Archaeology, Hyp. Interact. 150 topical issue, Vol. II, 2003.
5. De Atley, S. and Bishop, R. L., Towards an Integrated Interface for Archaeology and Archaeometry, In: R. L. Bishop and F. W. Lange (eds.), The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, University of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado, 1991, pp. 358-382.
6. Dunnell, R. C., Why Archaeologists Don't Care about Archaeometry, Archaeomaterials 7 (1993), 161-165.
7. Jones, R. F. J., Questions, Answers and the Consumer in Archaeological Sciences, In: E. A. Slater and J. O. Tate (eds.), Science and Archaeology Glasgow 1987: Proceedings of a Conference on the Application of Scientific Techniques in Archaeology, Glasgow, September 1987, BAR British Series 196(i), British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, 1987, pp. 1-7.
8. Killick, D. and Young, S. M. M., Archaeology and Archaeometry: From Casual Dating to a Meaningful Relationship?, Antiquity 71 (1997), 518-524.
9. Van Zelst, L., Archaeometry: The Perspective of an Administrator, In: R. L. Bishop and F. W. Lange (eds.), The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, University of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado, 1991, pp. 346-357.
10. Shimada, I., Chang, V., Wagner, U., Gebhard, R., Neff, H., Glascock, M. D. and Killick, D., Formative Ceramic Kilns and Production in Batán Grande, North Coast of Peru, In: I. Shimada (ed.), Andean Ceramics: Technology, Organization and Approaches. MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Supplement to Vol. 15, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, 1998, pp. 23-61.
11. Crown, P. L., Appraising the Legacy: A Thematic Synthesis, In: R. L. Bishop and F. W. Lange (eds.), The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, University of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado, 1991, pp. 383-393.
12. Pollard, A. M. and Heron, C., Archaeological Chemistry, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1996, pp. 104-148.