The land-use implications of transit-oriented development: Controlling the demand side of transportation congestion and urban sprawl

Urban Lawyer

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 547-571

  Freilich, Robert H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346435790     PISSN: 00420905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Carlson, Surface Transportation Policy Project, AT ROADS' END: TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CHOICES FOR COMMUNITIES at 6 (1995). Transit now accounts for only 5.12% of work trips in this country as opposed to 12.6% in 1960, while the modal share of the automobile increased from 69.5% to 88% over the same time period. U.S. DEP'T OF TRANSP., NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS at 231 (1995).
2. LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY, THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION & NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ALTERNATIVES TO SPRAWL at 6-8 (1995); Judy S. Davis & Samuel Seskin, Impacts of Urban Form on Travel Behavior, 29 URB. LAW. 215 (1997).
3. See Robert H. Freilich & Bruce G. Peshoff, The Social Costs of Sprawl, 29 URB. LAW. 183 (1997); Robert W. Burchell, The Economic and Fiscal Costs (and Benefits) of Sprawl, 29 URB. LAW. 159 (1997).