Computer-Mediated Instruction for Increasing Regular Education Students' Acceptance of Students with Mental Retardation

Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 313-320

  Hammond, Deborah G ^a   Zucker, Stanley H ^b   Sullivan Burstein, Karen ^b   DiGangi, Samuel A ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346422657     PISSN: 10793917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ballard, M., Corman, L., Gottlieb, J., & Kaufman, M. (1977). Improving the social status of main-streamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 605-611.
2. Balter, A., & Smith, S. (1981). Project CHANGE: Concepts of handicaps and attitudes need guidance and education. (ERIC Digest). Syracuse, N.Y: Eric Clearinghouse on Information Resources. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. 210 855).
3. Becker, H.J. (1988). Higher computer access for high ability students. BYTE, 12, 149-162.
4. Bookbinder, S. (1977). What every child needs to know. Exceptional Parent, 7, 31-35.
5. Brightman, A. (1977). "But their little brain is broken: Young children's conceptions of retardation. In M. Harmony (Ed.), Promise and performance: Children with special needs (pp. 240-252 ). Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger.
6. Cook, J., & Wollersheim, J. (1976). The effect of labeling of special education students on the perceptions of contact versus noncontact normal peers. Journal of Special Education, 10, 187-198.
7. Eastman, S. T., & Krendl, K. (1987). Computers and gender: Differential effects of electronic search on students' achievement and attitudes. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 41-47.
8. England, E. (1985). Interactional analysis: The missing factor in computer-aided learning design and evaluation. Educational Technology, 25, 24-28.
9. Fields, M.W. (1985). Exploratory data analysis in educational administration: Tempering methodological advances with a conservative note. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 21, 247-262.
10. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor of success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 69-86.
11. Goodman, H., Gottlieb, J., & Harrison, R. (1972). Social acceptance of EMRs integrated into a non-graded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 412-417.
12. Gottlieb, J., Cohen, L., & Goldstein, L. (1974). Social contact and personal adjustment as variable relating to attitudes toward EMR children. Training School Bulletin, 77, 9-16.
13. Gottlieb, J., & Davis, J. (1973). Social acceptance of EMR children during overt behavioral interactions. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 141-143.
14. Gottlieb, J., Semmel, M., & Veldman, P. (1978). Correlates of social status among mainstreamed mentally retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 396-405.
15. Hazzard, A. (1983). Children's experience with, knowledge of, and attitude toward disabled persons. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 131-139.
16. Hazzard, A., Brightman, R., Baker, B., & Ambrose, S. (1981). Enhancing typical children's acceptance of retarded peers through social contact and media (ERIC Digest). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on information Resources. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 195 658).
17. Janney, R., Snell, M., Beers, M., & Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating students with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes. Exceptional Children, 61, 425-439.
18. Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, p. 3.
19. Laszlo, A., & Castro, K. (1995). Technology and values: Interactive environments for future generations. Educational Technology, 2, 7-12.
20. Midlarsky, E., & Hannah, M. (March, 1984). Coping by siblings of the handicapped: The role of altruistic helping. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. (ERIC Digest). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on information Resources, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 008).
21. McGregor, G., Drossner, D., & Axelrod, S. (1990). Increasing instructional efficiency: A comparison of voice plus text vs. text alone on the error rate of students with mild disabilities during CAI. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 193-197.
22. Pea, R. D. (1991). Multimedia works: Student learning through multimedia tools. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 11, 58-66.
23. Peterson, G. (1974). Factors related to the attitudes of nonretarded children toward their EMR peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 412-416.
24. Robinson, M. (1979). Awareness program helps children understand special needs. Education Unlimited, 1, 25-27.
25. Sheare, J. (1974). Social acceptance of EMR adolescents in integrated programs. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 678-682.
26. Shinn, M., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: What you see is what you get. School Psychology Review, 18, 299-316.
27. Staninger, S. W. (1994). Hypertext technology" Educational consequences. Educational Technology, 4, 51-53.
28. Strauch, J. (1970). Social contact as a variable in the expressed attitudes of normal adolescents toward EMR pupils. Exceptional Children, 36, 495-500.
29. Tennyson, R. D. (1993). MAIS: A computer-based integrated instructional system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 93-100.
30. ToolBook, [Computer Software]. (1992). Bellview, WA: Asymetrix Corporation.
31. Turner, S. V., & Dipinto, V. M. (1992). Students as hypermedia authors: Themes emerging from a qualitative study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 187-199.