Analyzing the pure case: Women’s narratives of academic life

Women's Studies in Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1994, Pages 1-25

  Hawkins, Kate ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346414939     PISSN: 07491409     EISSN: 2152999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.1994.11089776     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrews, P. H. (1992). Sex and gender differences in group communication: Impact on the faciliation process. Small Group Research, 23, 74-94.
2. Bogdan, R., Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: Wiley.
3. TheChronicle of Higher Education. (1992). Almanac. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39, 3-37.
4. TheChronicle of Higher Education. (1993). AAUP survey finds faculty salaries rose 2.5% in 1992-1993. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39, 19, 22-26.
5. Clair, R. P. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60, 113-136.
6. Culham, P. (1987). Book review. WCC Newsletter, Summer, 17-21.
7. Deal, T. E., and Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Department of Institutional Research. (1993). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
9. Fairhurst, G. (1986). Male-Female communication on the job: Literature review and commentary. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook9, (pp. 83-116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.
11. Hall, R. M., and Sadler, B. R. (1983). Academic mentoring for women students and faculty: A new look at an old way to get ahead. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges.
12. Human Resource Information System. (1993). Office of Affirmative Action and Personnel Relations. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
13. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
14. Noe, R. A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. The Academy of Management Review, 13, 65-78.
15. Oklahoma State University. (1992). Faculty survey for academic year 1992. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
16. Pollard, N. (1993). Title IX complainant speaks out. Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, 89, 87.
17. Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Sadler, B. R. (1986). The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges.
19. Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L.S., Cook, S. W. (1976). Research methods in social relations (3rd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
20. Simeone, A. (1987). Academic women: Working towards equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.
21. Toth, E. (1988). Women in Academia. In A. L.Deneef.C.D. Goodwin and E. S. McCrate (Eds.), The academic's handbook, (pp. 3645). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22. Voisard, B. (1988). Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of student’s gender stereotypes. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Women’s Resource Center.
23. Wasserman, E., Lewin, A. Y., and Bleiweis, L. H. (1975). Women in academia: Evolving policies toward equal opportunities. New York: Praeger.
24. Wood, J. T., and Conrad, C. (1983). Paradox in the experiences of professional women. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 305-322.