Theory of Mind in Children's Naming of Drawings

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 389-412

  Browne, Cheryl A ^a   Woolley, Jacqueline D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346405438     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327647JCD0204_3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adi-Japha, E., Levin, I., & Solomon, S. (1998). Emergence of representation in drawing: The relation between kinematic and referential aspects. Cognitive Development, 13, 25-51.
2. Astington, J. (1991). Intention in the child's theory of mind. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds.), Children's theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding (pp. 157-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Black, M. (1979). How do pictures represent? In W. Kennick (Ed.), Art and philosophy: Readings in aesthetics (pp. 257-286). New York: St. Martin's Press.
4. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29.
5. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1997, April). The role of intentionality in children's naming of pictures. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
6. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200-204.
7. DeLoache, J., Pierroutsakos, S., Uttal, D., Rosengren, K., & Gottlieb, A. (1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 9, 205-210.
8. Dirks, J., & Gibson, E. (1977). Infants' perception of similarity between live people and their photographs. Child Development, 48, 124-130.
9. Freeman, N. H. (1995). The emergence of a framework theory of pictorial reasoning. In C. Lange-Kuttner & G. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking: Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 135-146). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Freeman, N. H. (2000). Communication and representation: Why mentalistic reasoning is a lifelong endeavour. In P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 349-366). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
11. Freeman, N. H., & Sanger, D. (1995). Commonsense aesthetics of rural children. Visual Arts Research, 21, 1-10.
12. Gelman, S., & Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76, 91-103.
13. Gelman, S., & Ebeling, K. (1998). Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition, 66, 35-47.
14. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
15. Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1999). Young children's recognition and description of their own and others' drawings. Developmental Science, 2, 476-489.
16. Hermeren, G. (1977). Structure, intention and representation. Grazer Philosophical Studies, 3, 89-106.
17. Hobson, R. P. (2000). The grounding of symbols: A social-developmental account. In P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 11-35). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
18. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Young children's understanding of belief and communicative intention. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 2, 17-40.
20. Schier, F. (1986). Deeper into pictures: An essay on pictorial representation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
22. Sharon, T. (2001, April). Children's understanding of the intentionality of symbols. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.