Chapter 3: Scientific Framework for Effectiveness Monitoring of the Northwest Forest Plan

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue PNW-GTR-437, 1999, Pages 49-68

  Noon, Barry R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346347915     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bell, S.S.; McCoy, E.D.; Mushinsky, H.R., eds. 1991. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. New York: Chapman and Hall.
2. Berger, J. 1997. Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology. 11: 69-78.
3. Block, W.M.; Brennan, L.A. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology. In: Power, D.M., ed. Current ornithology. New York: Plenum Press: 35-91. Vol. 11.
4. Brown, J.H. 1995. Organisms as engineers: a useful framework for studying effects on ecosystems? TREE. 10: 51-52.
5. Davis, W.J. 1996. Focal species offer management tool. Science. 271: 1362-1363.
6. Den Boer, P.J. 1981. On the survival of populations in a heterogeneous and variable environment. Oecologia. 50: 39-53.
7. Flather, C.H.; Brady, S.J.; Inkley, D.B. 1992. Regional habitat appraisals of wildlife communities: a landscape-level evaluation of a resource planing model using avian distribution data. Landscape Ecology. 7: 137-147.
8. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team [FEMAT]. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of the Interior [and others]. [Irregular pagination].
9. Furniss, M.; Hohler, D.; Larsen, P. [and others]. 1997. Northwest Forest Plan aquatic and riparian effectiveness monitoring. [Draft outline]. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest. On file with: Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bay Shore Way, Eureka, CA 95501.
10. Hemstrom, M.; Spies, T.; Palmer, C. [and others]. [In press]. Late-successional and old-growth forest effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-438. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 37 p.
11. Holthausen, R.S.; Raphael, M.G.; McKelvey, K.S. [and others]. 1995. The contribution of Federal and non-Federal habitat to persistence of the northern spotted owl on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington: report of the Reanalysis Team. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-352. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
12. Jones, G.G.; Lawton, J.H., eds. 1994. Linking species and ecosystems. New York: Chapman and Hall. 387 p.
13. Jones, C.G.; Lawton, J.H.; Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 69: 373-386.
14. Lamberson, R.H.; McKelvey, R.; Noon, B.R.; Voss, C. 1992. A dynamic analysis of northern spotted owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology. 6: 505-512.
15. Landres, P.B. 1992. Ecological indicators: panacea or liability? In: McKenzie, D.H.; Hyatt, D.E.; McDonald, V.J., eds. Ecological indicators. London: Elsevier Appied Science: 1295-1318. Vol. 2.
16. Landres, P.B.; Verner, J.; Thomas, J.W. 1988. Ecological use of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conservation Biology. 2: 316-328.
17. Lint, J.; Noon, B.; Anthony, R. [and others]. [In press]. Northern spotted owl effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-440. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
18. Madsen, S.; Evans, D.; Hamer, T. [and others]. [In press]. Marbled murrelet effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-439. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
19. Max, T.A.; Schreuder, H.T.; Hazard, J.W. [and others]. 1996. The Pacific Northwest Region vegetation and inventory monitoring system. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-493. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p.
20. Morrison, M.L.; Mannan, W.; Marcot, B. 1994. Wildlife habitat relationships. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 343 p.
21. Murphy, D.D.; Wilcox, B.A. 1986. Butterfly diversity in natural habitat fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In: Verner, J.; Morrison, M.L.; Ralph, C.J., eds. Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press: 287-292.
22. Noon, B.R. 1986. Biometric approaches to modeling - the researcher's viewpoint. In: Verner, J.; Morrison, M.L.; Ralph, C.J., eds. Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press: 197-201.
23. Noon, B.R. 1997. Does providing for spotted owl viability ensure the integrity of late serai forest in the Pacific Northwest? [Abstract]. In: 1997 annual meeting, Society for Conservation Biology; [1997] June 6-8; Victoria, BC. [Place of publication unknown]: Society for Conservation Biology.
24. Noon, B.R.; McKelvey, K.S. 1996. A common framework for conservation planning: linking individual and metapopulation models. In: McCullough, D.R., ed. Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Covelo, CA: Island Press: 139-166.
25. Noon, B.R.; McKelvey, K.S.; Murphy, D. 1997. Developing an analytical context for multispecies conservation planning. In: Pickett, S.T.A.; Ostfield, R.S.; Shachak, M. [and others], eds. The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. New York: Chapman and Hall: 43-59.
26. Noss, R.F.; Csuti, B. 1994. Fragmentation. In: Meffe, G.K.; Carroll, C.R. Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.: 237-264
27. Pielou, E.C. 1981. The usefulness of ecological models: a stock-taking. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 56: 17-31.
28. Power, M.E.; Tilman, D.; Estes, J.A. [and others]. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience. 46: 609-620.
29. Rickers, J.R.; Queen, L.P.; Arthaud, G.J. 1995. A proximity-based approach to assessing habitat. Landscape Ecology. 10: 309-321.
30. Short, J.; Turner, B. 1994. A test of the vegetation mosaic hypothesis: a hypothesis to explain the decline and extinction of Australian mammals. Conservation Biology. 8: 439-449.
31. Southwood, T.R.E. 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology. 46: 337-365.
32. Southwood, T.R.E. 1988. Tactics, strategies, and templets. Oikos. 52: 3-18.
33. Stouder, D.J.; Bisson, P.A.; Naiman, R.G., eds. 1997. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems. New York: Chapman and Hall.
34. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management [USDA and USDI]. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. [Place of publication unknown]. 74 p.
35. Vegetation Strike Team. 1996. Interagency vegetation information: data needs, standards, and implementation next steps. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management; report; Interagency Resource Information Coordinating Committee. 21 p.
36. Verner, J.; Morrison, M.L.; Ralph, C.J. 1986. Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships for terrestrial vertebrates. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co. 374 p.
38. Wiens, J.A. 1996. Wildlife in patchy environments: metapopulations, mosaics, and management. In: McCullough, D.R., ed. Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, CA: 53-84.
39. Willson, M.F.; Halupka, K.C. 1995. Anadromous fishes as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conservation Biology. 9: 489-497.