Pupal Structures Associated with the Mode of Pupation in Satyrinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae)

Zoologischer Anzeiger

Volumn 237, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 331-337

  Starnecker, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cocoon; Cremaster; Functional morphology; Hooked setae; Moult; Pupa; Pupal attachment; Suspended pupa

Indexed keywords

INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; SATYRINAE;

EID: 0346341125     PISSN: 00445231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BRYK, F. (1921): Beiträge zur Biologie und Morphologie einiger skandinavischer Rhopalozeren. I. Neues über Parnassius apollo L. Ent. Tidskr. 41: 135-147.
2. BUNNETT, E.J. (1919): Note on the pupation of Aglais urticae and Vanessa io. Proc. South London ent. nat. Hist. Soc. 1919/1920: 32-33.
3. COMMON, I.F.B. & WATERHOUSE, D.F. (1972): Butterflies of Australia. Angus & Robertson, Sydney.
4. DEVRIES, P.J. (1986): The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history. Vol. 1. Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. EBERT, G. (1991): Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Tagfalter I and II. 2 vols. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
6. EITSCHBERGER, U. (1984): Studien einiger ausgewählter Mikrofeinstrukturen der Praeimaginal-Stadien bei Papilioniden (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Atalanta 15: 350-372.
7. EMMET, A.M. & HEATH, J. (1987): The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 7, Part I. Hesperiidae- Nymphalidae. Harley Books, Colchester.
8. KOCH, M. (1991): Wir bestimmen Schmetterlinge. 3rd ed., Neumann, Radebeul.
9. MOSHER, E. (1916): A classification of the Lepidoptera based on characters of the pupa. Bull. Ill. State Lab. Nat. His. 12: 15-159.
10. RILEY, C.V. (1879): Philosophy of the pupation of butterflies and particularly of the Nymphalidae. Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 28: 455-463.
11. Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz (ed.) (1988): Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Arten, Gefährdung, Schutz. 2nd ed., Holliger, Egg.
12. SCOBLE, M.J. (1992): The Lepidoptera. Form, Function, and Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. SCOTT, J.A. (1986): The butterflies of North America. A natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
14. STARNECKER, G. (1998): A safety band prevents falling of the suspended pupa of the butterfly Inachis io (Nymphalidae) during moult. A comparison with the girdled pupa of Pieris brassicae (Pieridae). Zoomorphology 118: 129-136.
15. STARNECKER, G. & BURRET, M. (1998): Feinstrukturen der Raupen und Puppen zweier Tagfalter zur Befestigung am Verpuppungsplatz. Mikrokosmos 87: 295-302.
16. STARNECKER, G., BURRET, M. & NISSLER, A. (1998): The exposed butterfly pupa of Zerynthia polyxena (Papilionidae: Zerynthiinae) and its attachment to the substrate of the pupation site. Ent. Z. 108: 157-164.
17. URQUHART, F.A. (1970): Mechanism of cremaster withdrawal and attachment in pendant rhopalocerous pupae (Lepidoptera). Can. Ent. 102: 1579-1582.
18. VAN SON, G. (1955): The butterflies of Southern Africa. Part II. Nymphalidae: Danainae and Satyrinae. The Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
19. WEIDEMANN, H.-J. (1986): Tagfalter. Entwicklung, Lebensweise. Vol. 1. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen.
20. WEIDEMANN, H.-J. (1988): Tagfalter. Biologie, Ökologie, Biotopschutz. Vol. 2. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen.