From local interactions to population dynamics in site-based models of ecology

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 497-517

  Johansson, A ^a   Sumpter, D J T ^a,b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Individual based; Population dynamics; Site based; Stochastic difference equations

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0346338091     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00076-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Berryman, A.A., 1999. Principles of Population Dynamics and their Application. Stanley Thornes (Publishers), Cheltenham, UK, pp. 243.
2. Boerlijst M., Lamers M.E., Hogeweg P. Evolutionary consequences of spiral waves in a host-parasitoid system. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 253:1993;15-18.
3. Bolker B., Grenfell B. Space, persistence and dynamics of measles epidemics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 348:1995;309-320.
4. Capinski, M., Kopp, E., 1999. Measure, Integral and Probability. Springer, London, pp. 227.
5. Czaran T. Spatiotemporal Models of Population and Community Dynamics. 1998;Chapman & Hall, London.
6. DeAngelis D.L., Gross L.J. Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems. 1992;Chapman & Hall, London.
7. Dembo, A., Zeitouni, O., 1992. Large Deviation Techniques. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London, pp. 346.
8. Diekmann U., Law R. Relaxation projections and the method of moments. Diekmann U.et al. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. 2000;412-455 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Diekmann, U., Law, R., Metz, J.A.J., 2000. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 565.
10. Durrett R., Levin S.A. Stochastic spatial models. a users' guide to ecological applications Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 343:1994;329-350.
11. Durrett R., Levin S.A. The importance of being discrete and spatial. Theor. Popul. Biol. 46:1994;363-395.
12. Ermentrout G., Edelstein-Keshet L. Cellular automata approaches to biological modelling. J. Theor. Biol. 160:1992;97-133.
13. Gurney, W.S.C., Nisbet, R.M., 1998. Ecological Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 335.
14. Hanski, I., 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 313.
15. Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K., 1998. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 323.
16. Iwao K., Ohsaki N. Inter- and intraspecific interactions among larvae of specialist and generalist parasitoids. Resource Popul. Ecol. 38:1996;265-273.
17. Iwasa Y., Nakamaru M., Levin S.A. Allelopathy of bacteria in a lattice population. competition between colicin-sensitive and colicin-producing strains Evol. Ecol. 12:1998;785-802.
18. Keeling M.J. Using individual-based simulations to test the Levins metapopulation paradigm. J. Anim. Ecol. 71:2002;270-279.
19. Keeling M.J., Gilligan C.A. Metapopulation dynamics of bubonic plague. Nature. 407:2000;903-906.
20. Keeling M.J., Wilson H.B., Pacala S.W. Reinterpreting space, time lags, and functional responses in ecological models. Science. 290:2000;1758-1761.
21. Keeling M.J., Wilson H.B., Pacala S.W. Deterministic limits to stochastic spatial models of natural enemies. Am. Nat. 159:2002;57-80.
22. Keeling M.J.et al. Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic. stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape Science. 294:2001;813-817.
23. Kerr B., Riley M.A., Feldman M.W., Bohannan B.J.M. Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature. 418:2002;171-174.
24. Kolchin V.F., Sevastyanov B.A., Chistyakov V.P. Random Allocations. 1978;Winston-Wiley, New York.
25. Levins R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15:1969;237-240.
26. Levins R. Extinction. Lecture Notes Math. 2:1970;75-107.
27. Nicholson A.J. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2:1954;9-65.
28. Nowak M.A., May R.M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature. 359:1992;826-829.
29. Pacala S.W. Neighbourhood models of plant population dynamics. 2. Multispecies models of annuals. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29:1986;262-292.
30. Pacala S.W. Neighbourhood models of plant population dynamics. 4. Single-species and multispecies models of annuals with dormant seeds. Am. Nat. 128:1986;859-878.
31. Pacala S.W., Silander J.A. Neighbourhood models of plant population dynamics. 1. Single-species models of annuals. Am. Nat. 125:1985;385-411.
32. Pacala S.W., Tilman D. Limiting similarity in mechanistic and spatial models of plant competition in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 143:1996;222-257.
33. Pascual M., Levin S.A. From individuals to population densities. searching for the intermediate scale of nontrivial determinism Ecology. 80:1999;2225-2236.
34. Prinkkila M-L., Hanski I. Complex competitive interactions in four species of Lucilia blowflies. Ecol. Entomol. 20:1995;261-272.
35. Rand, D.A., 1999. Correlation equations and pair approximations for spatial ecologies. In: McGlade, J. (Ed.), Theoretical Ecology, Vol. 2, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 140-142.
36. Rand D.A., Wilson H.B. Using spatio-temporal chaos and intermediate-scale determinism to quantify spatially extended ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 259:1995;111-117.
37. Rath W. Co-adaptation of Apis cerana Fabr. and Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie. 30:1999;97-110.
38. Royama, T., 1992. Analytical Population Dynamics. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 369.
39. Sumpter D.J.T., Broomhead D.S. Relating individual behaviour to population dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 268:2001;925-932.
40. Takano M., Toquenaga Y., Fujii K. Polymorphism of competition type and its genetics in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptra: Bruchidae). Popul. Ecol. 43:2001;265-273.
41. Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Wardlaw J.C. Contest competition among Maculinea rebeli butterfly larvae in ant nests. Ecol. Entomol. 18:1993;73-76.
42. Toquenaga Y. Contest and scramble competitions in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptra: Bruchidae) II. Larval competition and interference mechanisms. Resource Popul. Ecol. 35:1993;57-68.
43. Toquenaga Y., Fujii K. Contest and scramble competition between two bruchid species (Coleoptra: Bruchidae) I. Larval competition curves and interference mechanisms. Resource Popul. Ecol. 32:1990;349-363.
44. Toquenaga Y., Fujii K. Contest and scramble competition between two bruchid species (Coleoptra: Bruchidae) III. Multiple-generation competition experiment. Resource Popul. Ecol. 32:1990;187-197.
45. Toquenaga Y., Fujii K. Contest and scramble competition between two bruchid species (Coleoptra: Bruchidae) II. Larval competition experiment. Resource Popul. Ecol. 33:1991;129-139.
46. Tuda M. Evolutionary character changes and population responses in an insect host-parasitoid experimental system. Resource Popul. Ecol. 40:1998;293-299.
47. Tuda M., Iwasa Y. Evolution of contest competition and its effect on host-parasitoid dynamics. Evol. Ecol. 12:1998;855-870.
48. Turchin P., Taylor A.D. Complex dynamics in ecological time series. Ecology. 73(1):1992;289-305.