A posteriori analysis of a penalty method and application to the stokes problem

Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1599-1628

  Bernardi, C ^a   Girault, V ^a   Hecht, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

A posteriori analysis; Error indicators; Penalty method; Stokes problem

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346328493     PISSN: 02182025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218202503003057     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. Bergam, C. Bernardi and Z. Mghazli, A posteriori analysis of the finite element discretization of a nonlinear parabolic equation, submitted.
2. M. Bercovier, Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Rouen (1976).
3. M. Bercovier, Perturbation of mixed variational problems. Application to mixed finite element methods, R.A.I.R.O. Anal. Numér. 12 (1978) 211-236.
4. C. Bernardi and V. Girault, A local regularization operator for triangular and quadrilateral finite elements, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998) 1893-1916.
5. C. Bernardi, B. Métivet and R. Verfürth, Analyse numérique d'indicateurs d'erreur, in Maillage et adaptation, ed. P.-L. George (Hermès, 2001), pp. 251-278.
6. G. F. Carey and R. Krishnan, Penalty approximation of Stokes flow, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 35 (1982) 169-206.
7. G. F. Carey and R. Krishnan, Penalty finite element method for the Navier-Stokes equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 42 (1984) 183-224.
8. G. F. Carey and R. Krishnan, Convergence of iterative methods in penalty finite element approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 80 (1987) 1-29.
9. P. Clément, Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization, R.A.I.R.O. Anal. Numér. 9 (1975) 77-84.
10. M. Dauge and E. Faou, in preparation.
11. K. Eriksson and C. Johnson, Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems. I. A linear model problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28 (1991) 43-77.
12. K. Eriksson and C. Johnson, Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems. IV. Nonlinear problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32 (1995) 1729-1749.
13. D. A. French, S. Larsson and R. H. Nochetto, Pointwise a posteriori error analysis for an adaptive penalty finite element method for the obstacle problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 1 (2001) 18-38.
14. P. J. Frey and P.-L. George, Maillages, applications aux éléments finis (Hermès, 1999).
15. V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for the Navier-Stokes Equations, Theory and Algorithms (Springer-Verlag, 1986).
16. F. Hecht and O. Pironneau, FreeFem++, see www.freefem.org.
17. D. S. Malkus and E. T. Olsen, Incompressible finite elements which fail the discrete LBB condition, in Penalty-Finite Element Methods in Mechanics (Phoenix, Ariz., 1982) (Amer. Soc. Mech. Engineers, 1982), pp. 33-50.
18. J. Nečas, Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques (Masson, 1967).
19. L. R. Scott and S. Zhang, Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions, Math. Comput. 54 (1990) 483-493.
20. R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for the Stokes equations, Numer. Math. 55 (1989) 309-325.
21. R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh-Refinement Techniques (Wiley & Teubner, 1996).
22. R. Verfürth, Error estimates for some quasi-interpolation operators, Model. Math. Anal. Numér. 33 (1999) 695-713.
23. R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimation techniques for non-linear elliptic and parabolic pdes, Rev. Euro. Éléments Finis 9 (2000) 377-402.