Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: A comparison

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 268-272

  Kumbuloglu, Ovul ^a   User, Atilla ^b   Toksavul, Suna ^b   Vallittu, Pekka K ^b  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

All ceramics; Intra oral repair; Shear bond Strength

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; EMPRESS 2; HELIOBOND; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILISTOR; TETRIC CERAM; TOOTH CEMENT; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; WATER;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; HUMANS; LITHIUM COMPOUNDS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; SHEAR STRENGTH; SILANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 0346327065     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350310005556     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW. Clinical experiences with bonded porcelain laminate veneers. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26: 121-7.
2. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9-18.
3. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:216-25.
4. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-77.
5. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415-26.
6. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:161-7.
7. van Dijken JW, Hoglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-25.
8. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1998; 23:318-26.
9. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Resin-bonded fixed partial denturesa literature review with presentation of a novel approach. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:460-7.
10. Kern M, Strub JR. Bonding to alumina ceramic in restorative dentistry: clinical results over up to 5 years. J Dent 1998;26: 245-9.
11. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91.
12. Pratt RC, Burgess JO, Schwartz RS, Smith JH. Evaluation of bond strength of six porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:11-3.
13. Özcan M, Schulz A, Niedermeier W. Clinical outcomes on fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations repaired with an intraoral silica coating method (abstract 1573). J Dent Res 1999; 78:302.
14. Özcan M. Evaluation of alternative intraoral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:194-203.
15. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74.
16. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003. In press.
17. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2000;2: 305-13.
18. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705.
19. Sorenson JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4:17-23.
20. al Edris A, al Jabr A, Coley RL, Barghi N. SEM evaulation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:734-9.
21. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61.
22. Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Estafan A, Jia W. Effect of pre-bonding procedures on shear bond strength of resin composite to pressable ceramic. Gen Dent 2000;48:412-6.
23. Madani M, Chu FCS, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and alumina core. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.
24. Pleuddemann EP. Nature of adhesion through silane coupling agents. New York: Plenum Press; 1982. p. 111.
25. Llobell A, Nicholls JI, Kois JC, Daly CH. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:205-13.
26. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:480-8.
27. Gregory WA, Moss SM. Effects of heterogeneous layers of composite and time on composite repair on porcelain. Oper Dent 1990;15:18-22.