The use of two electronic idea generation techniques in strategy planning meetings

Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 370-382

  Aiken, Milam ^a   Sloan, Hugh ^a   Paolillo, Joseph ^a   Motiwalla, Luvai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346322568     PISSN: 00219436     EISSN: 15524582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002194369703400403     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aiken, M., & Carlisle, J. (1992). An automated idea consolidation tool for computer supported cooperative work. Information and Management, 23, 373-382.
2. Aiken, M., Krosp, J., Shirani, A., & Martin, J. (1994). Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups. Information and Management, 27, 141-149.
3. Aiken, M., & Vanjani, M. (1996). Idea generation with electronic poolwriting and gallery writing. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 7, 1-9.
4. Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., & Paolillo, J. (1996). A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques. Information and Management, 30, 91-99.
5. Aljumaih, K., Aiken, M., & Vanjani, M. (1995, November). A comparison of brainstorming and brainwriting. Decision Sciences Institute Conference, Boston, MA, 480-482.
6. Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. (1993). The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research, 24, 430-462.
7. Bouchard, T., Drauden, G., & Barasaloux, J. (1974). A comparison of individual, subgroup and total group methods of problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 226-227.
8. Butterfield, J., Rathnam, S., & Whinston, A. (1992). Groupware: A survey of perceptions and practice. ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, 13, 6-7.
9. Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluation tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sciences, 36, 689-703.
10. Dennis, A., George, J., Jessup, L., Nunamaker, J., & Vogel, D. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 591-616.
11. Dennis, A., Heminger, A., Nunamaker, J., & Vogel, D. (1990). Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience. Information and Management, 18, 111-121.
12. Dennis, A., Nunamaker, J., & Vogel, D. (1989). GDSS laboratory experiments and field studies: Closing the gap. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona.
13. Department of Management Information Systems. (1988). PLEXSYS Manual. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
14. Easton, G., George, J., Nunamaker, J., & Pendergast, M. (1990). Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 85-100.
15. Gallupe, R., Dennis, A., Cooper, W., Valacich, J., Bastianutti, L., & Nunamaker, J. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. The Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.
16. Geschka, H. (1980). Perspectives on using various creativity techniques. In S. Gryskiewicz (Ed.), Proceedings Creativity Week II, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
17. Geschka, H., von Reibnitz, U., & Storvik, K. (1981). Idea Generation Methods: Creative Solutions to Business and Technical Problems. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.
18. Gordon, M., Slade, L., & Schmidt, N. (1986). Student guinea pigs: Porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena. Academy of Management Review, 11, 191-207.
19. Greenberg, J. (1987). The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12, 157-159.
20. Herniter, B., & Gargeya, V. (1995, March). System dynamics of electronic brainstorming: A simulation. Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings, Providence, RI, 265-269.
21. Huber, G. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15, 47-71.
22. Hwang, H., & Guynes, J. (1994). The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making. Information and Management, 26, 189-198.
23. Jarvenpaa, S., Rao, V., & Huber, G. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645-666.
24. Jessup, L., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 313-321.
25. McLeod, P. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
26. Milton, G. (1965). Enthusiasm versus effectiveness in groups and individual problem solving. Psychological Reports, 16, 30-37.
27. Nunamaker, J., Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Vogel, D., & George, J. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 30-39.
28. Osborn, A. (1957). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York: Scribner's.
29. Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1989). The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5, 197-216.
30. TeamFocus Facilitation with GroupSystems V Basic Tools [computer program]. (1993). TENT730C. IBM Corporation.
31. Turoff, M. (1972). Delphi conferencing: Computer-based conferencing with anonymity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3, 159-204.
32. VanGundy, A. (1992). Idea Power: Techniques and Resources to Unleash the Creativity in your Organization. New York: American Management Association.
33. Vogel, D., & Nunamaker, J. (1990). Group decision support system impact: A multimethodological exploration. Information and Management, 18, 15-28.
34. Vroom, V., Grant, L., & Cotton, T. (1969). The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 77-95.
35. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.