Functional Imaging of Pitch Analysis

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 999, Issue , 2003, Pages 40-49

  Griffiths, Timothy D ^a,b,c  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brain; fMRI; Functional imaging; Music; PET; Pitch analysis

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MUSIC; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTION; PITCH; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 0346308295     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1284.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. LOGOTHETIS, N.K. et al. 2001. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412: 150-157.
2. HALL, D.A. et al. 1999. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7: 213-223.
3. PARRI, R. & V. CRUNELLI. 2003. An astrocyte bridge from synapse to blood flow. Nature Neurosci. 6: 5-6.
4. PLACK, C.J. et al. 2003. Pitch Perception. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. In press.
5. FRITH, C., R. PERRY & E. LUMER. 1999. The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework. Trends Cognit. Sci. 3: 105-114.
6. GRIFFITHS, T.D. et al. 1998. Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain. Nature Neurosci. 1: 421-427.
7. GRIFFITHS, T.D. et al. 2001. Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem. Nature Neurosci. 4: 633-637.
8. PATTERSON, R.D. et al. 2002. The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron 36: 767-776.
9. LUMER, E.D., K.J. FRISTON & G. REES. 1998. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
10. RAVICZ, M.E., J.R. MELCHER & N.Y. KIANG. 2000. Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108: 1683-1696.
11. GUIMARES, A.R. et al. 1998. Imaging subcortical activity in humans. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6: 33-41.
12. YOST, W.A., R. PATTERSON & S. SHEFT. 1996. A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 1066-1078.
13. WIEGREBE, L. & I.M. WINTER. 2001. Temporal representation of iterated rippled noise as a function of delay and sound level in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 1206-1219.
14. CHAWLA, D., E.D. LUMER & K.J. FRISTON. 1999. The relationship between synchronization among neuronal populations and their mean activity levels. Neural Comput. 11: 1389-411.
15. LANGNER, G. 1992. Periodicity encoding in the auditory system. Hear. Res. 60: 115-142.
16. PATTERSON, R.D., M.H. ALLERHAND & C. GIGUERRE. 1995. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98: 1890-1894.
17. MOROSAN, P. et al. 2001. Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitechtonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. NeuroImage 13: 684-701.
18. LAUTER, J.L. et al. 1985. Tonotopic organisation in the human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography. Hear. Res. 20: 199-205.
19. LOCKWOOD, A.H. et al. 1999. The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: responses to 0.5 and 4.0kHz tones at varied intensities. Cereb. Cortex. 9: 65-76.
20. WESSINGER, C.M. et al. 1997. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5: 18-25.
21. TALAVAGE, T.M. et al. 2000. Frequency-dependent responses exhibited by multiple regions in human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 150: 225-244.
22. KAAS, J.H. & T.A. HACKETT. 1998. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates. Audiol. NeuroOtol. 3: 73-85.
23. MERZENICH, M.M. & J.F. BRUGGE. 1973. Representation of the cochlear partition on the suprior temporal plane of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 24: 193-202.
24. PENAGOS, H., A.J. OXENHAM & J. MELCHER. 2003. Effects of harmonic resolvability on the cortical activity produced by complex tones. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
25. ZATORRE, R.J., A.C. EVANS & E. MEYER. 1994. Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. J. Neurosci. 14: 1908-1919.
26. ZATORRE, R.J. et al. 1996. Hearing in the minds ear-a PET investigation of musical imagery and perception. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 8: 29-46.
27. LIEGEOIS-CHAUVEL, C. et al. 1998. Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain 121: 1853-1867.
28. GRIFFITHS, T.D. et al. 1999. A common neural substrate for the analysis of pitch and duration pattern in segmented sound? NeuroReport 18: 3825-3830.
29. KRUMHANSL, C.L. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press. New York.
30. GRIFFITHS, T.D. & J.D. WARREN. 2002. The planum temporale as a computational hub. Trend Neurosci. 25: 348-353.