Berlin, Moscow and Bombay: The marxism that India inherited

South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 63-76

  Sherlock, Stephen ^a  

^a Parliamentary Research Library   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346307871     PISSN: 00856401     EISSN: 14790270     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00856409808723324     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. K. Marx, Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (New York, 1975), p. 15.
2. K. Marx, Civil War in France (Moscow, 1976).
3. Sanjay Seth, Marxist Theory and Nationalist Politics: The Case of Colonial India (New Delhi, 1995), p. 139.
4. V. I. Lenin, Imperialism: Highest Stage of Capitalism (Moscow, 1979).
5. Seth S., Imperialism: Highest Stage of Capitalism pp. 58-70.
6. B. Brugger & D. Kelly, Chínese Marxism in the Post-Mao Era (Stanford, 1990), p. 45.
7. S. Sherlock, ‘Resolving the Conflict?: TheUncertain Futureof Trade Unionism in West Bengal’, South Asían Issues, Indian Ocean Centre for Peace Studies, Perth, 1993.
8. S. Sherlock, Economic and Political Weekly, 5 April 1997, p. 721.1,1
9. Arun Ghosh, ‘Capitalism, Nation State and Development in a Globalised World’, Economic and Political Weekly, 5-11 April 1997, p. 686.
10. Partha Chatterjee, ‘Beyond the Nation? Or Within?’, Economic and Political Weekly, 4-11 Jan. 1997, p. 34.
11. Praful Bidwai & Achin Vanaik, ‘An Open Letter to the Left’, Economic and Political Weekly, 18 Jan. 1997, pp. 71-4.
12. Praful Bidwai & Achin Vanaik, ‘Class Re-formation in Bombay: Has Organised Labour Risen to the Challenge’, Economic and Political Weekly, Review of Labour, 28 Dec. 1996, L34-L38.14 Seth, Economic and Political Weekly p. 12.