The use of hydrological and geoelectrical data to fix the boundary conditions of a ground water flow model: A case study

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 297-303

  Giudici, Mauro ^a   Manera, Martina ^a   Romano, Emanuele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Boundary conditions; Geoelectrical tomography; Ground water flow; Statistical analysis; Surface and ground water interactions

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; BOUNDARY CONDITION; FLOW MODELING; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; LAKE LEVEL; TOMOGRAPHY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; LOMBARDY; MILAN; MILANO; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 0346304819     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-7-297-2003     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dey, A. and Morrison, F., 1979a. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures. Geophys. Prospect., 27, 1020-1036.
2. Dey, A. and Morrison, F., 1979b. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures. Geophysics, 44, 753-780.
3. Farquharson, C.G. and Oldenburg, D.W., 1998. Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophys. J. Int., 134, 213-227.
4. Giudici, M., Foglia, L., Parravicini, G. Ponzini, G. and Sincich, B., 2000. A quasi three dimensional model of water flow in the subsurface of Milano (Italy): the stationary flow. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 113-124.
5. Loke, M.H., 1994. The inversion of two-dimensional resistivity data. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
6. Loke, M.H., 2003. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software, Penang, Malaysia.
7. Loke, M.H., Acworth, I. and Dahlin, T., 2001. a comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Proc. ASEG 15th Geophysical Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
8. Mehel, S. and Hill, M.C., 2002. Development and evaluation of a local grid refinement method for block centred finite difference groundwater models using shared nodes. Advan. Water Resour., 25, 497-511.
9. Romano, E., Giudici, M. and Ponzini, G., 2002. Simulation of interactions between well fields with nested models: a case study, Acta Univ. Carolinae - Geologica, 46, 637-640.
10. Taylor, J.R., 1997. An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, USA.