Assessing the quality of american doctoral program faculty in criminology and criminal justice, 1991–1995

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 187-210

  Cohn, Ellen G ^a   Farrington, David P ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346293647     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511259800084281     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Buss, A.R., 1976. Evaluation of Canadian Psychology Departments Based upon Citation and Publication Counts. Canadian Psychological Review, 17: 143–150.
2. Chapman, A.J., 1989. Assessing Research: Citation-Count Shortcomings. The Psychologist, 2: 336–344.
3. Cohn, E.G., and Farrington, D.P., 1990. Differences between British and American Criminology: An Analysis of Citations. British Journal of Criminology, 30: 467–482.
4. Cohn, E.G., and Farrington, D.P., 1994a. Who are the Most Influential Criminologists in the English-Speaking World?. British Journal of Criminology, 34: 204–225.
5. Cohn, E.G., and Farrington, D.P., 1994b. Who are the Most-Cited Scholars in Major American Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals?. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22: 517–534.
6. Cohn, E.G., and Farrington, D.P., 1996. “ Crime and Justice and the Criminal Justice and Criminology Literature ”. In Crime and Justice, Edited by: Tonry, M., Vol. 20, 193–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. in
7. Cohn, E.G., Farrington, D.P., and Wright, R.A., 1998. Evaluating Criminology and Criminal Justice, Westport, CT: Greenwood. in press
8. Cole, J., and Cole, S., 1971. Measuring the Quality of Sociological Research: Problems in the Use of the Science Citation Index. American Sociologist, 6: 23–29.
9. DeZee, M.R., 1980. The Productivity of Criminology and Criminal Justice Faculty, Chicago: The Joint Commission on Criminology and Criminal Justice Education and Standards.
10. Diamond, A.M., 1986. What is a Citation Worth?. Journal of Human Resources, 21: 200–215.
11. Endler, N.S., 1977. Research Productivity and Scholarly Impact of Canadian Psychology Departments. Canadian Psychological Review, 18: 152–168.
12. Endler, N.S., Rushton, J.P., and Roediger, H.C., 1978. Productivity and Scholarly Impact (Citations) of British, Canadian, and U.S. Departments of Psychology (1975). American Psychologist, 33: 1064–1082.
13. Fabianic, D., 1979. Relative Prestige of Criminal Justice Doctoral Programs. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7: 135–145.
14. Fabianic, D., 1981. Institutional Affiliation of Authors in Selected Criminal Justice Journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9: 247–252.
15. Flanagan, T.J., 1990. Criminal Justice Doctoral Programs in the United States and Canada: Findings from a National Survey. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1: 195–213.
16. Garfield, E., 1979. Is Citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool?. Scientometrics, 1: 359–375.
17. Gordon, R.A., and Vicari, P.J., 1992. Eminence in Social Psychology: A Comparison of Textbook Citation, Social Science Citation Index, and Research Productivity Ranking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18: 26–38.
18. Greene, J.R., Bynum, T.S., and Webb, V.J., 1984. Patterns of Entry, Professional Identity, and Attitudes Towards Crime-Related Education: A Study of Criminal Justice and Criminology Faculty. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12: 39–59.
19. Marenin, O., 1993. Faculty productivity in Criminal Justice Ph.D. Programs: Another View. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 4: 190–192.
20. Mijares, T., and Blackburn, R., 1990. Evaluating Criminal Justice Programs: Establishing Criteria. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18: 33–41.
21. Myers, C.R., 1970. Journal Citations and Scientific Eminence in Contemporary Psychology. American Psychologist, 25: 1041–1048.
22. Parker, L.C., and Goldfeder, E., 1979. Productivity Ratings of Graduate Programs in Criminal Justice Based on Publications in Ten Critical Journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7: 125–133.
23. Roche, T., and Smith, D.L., 1978. Frequency of Citations as Criterion for the Ranking of Departments, Journals and Individuals. Sociological Inquiry, 48: 49–57.
24. Rushton, J.P., 1984. Evaluating Research Eminence in Psychology: The Construct Validity of Citation Counts. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 37: 33–36.
25. Rushton, J.P., 1989. A Ten-Year Scientometric Revisit of British Psychology Departments. The Psychologist, 2: 64–68.
26. Rushton, J.P., and Endler, N.S., 1977. The Scholarly Impact and Research Productivity of Departments of Psychology in the United Kingdom. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 30: 369–373.
27. Shichor, D., 1982. An Analysis of Citations in Introductory Criminology Textbooks: A Research Note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10: 231–237.
28. Sorensen, J.R., 1994. Scholarly Productivity in Criminal Justice: Institutional Affiliation of Authors in the Top Ten Criminal Justice Journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22: 535–547.
29. Sorensen, J.R., Patterson, A.L., and Widmayer, A., 1992. Publication Productivity of Faculty Members in Criminology and Criminal Justice Doctoral Programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 3: 1–33.
30. Sorensen, J.R., Patterson, A.L., and Widmayer, A., 1993. Measuring Faculty Productivity in a Multidisciplinary Field: A Response to Professor Marenin. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 4: 193–196.
31. Sorensen, J.R., Widmayer, A., and Scarpitti, F.R., 1994. Examining the Criminal Justice and Criminological Paradigms: An Analysis of ACJS and ASC Members. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 5: 149–166.
32. Sweetland, J.H., 1989. Errors in Bibliographic Citations: A Continuing Problem. Library Quarterly, 59: 291–304.
33. Taggart, W.A., and Holmes, M.D., 1991. Institutional Productivity in Criminal Justice and Criminology: An Examination of Author Affiliation in Selected Journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19: 549–561.
34. Thomas, C.W., 1987. The Utility of Citation-Based Quality Assessments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15: 165–171.
35. Thomas, C.W., and Bronick, M.J., 1984. The Quality of Doctoral Programs in Deviance, Criminology and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12: 21–37.
36. Travis, L.F., 1987. Assessing the Quality of Doctoral Programs in Deviance, Criminology and Criminal Justice: A Response to Thomas and Bronick. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15: 157–163.
37. Vaughn, M.S., and del Carmen, R.V., 1992. An Annotated List of Journals in Criminal Justice and Criminology: A Guide for Authors. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 3: 39–142.
38. Williams, F.P., McShane, M.D., and Wagoner, C.P., 1995. Differences in Assessments of Relative Prestige and Utility of Criminal Justice and Criminology Journals. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19: 215–238.
39. Wolfgang, M.E., Figlio, R.M., and Thornberry, T.P., 1978. Evaluating Criminology, New York: Elsevier.
40. Wright, R.A., 1995. The Most-Cited Scholars in Criminology: A Comparison of Textbooks and Journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23: 303–334.
41. Wright, R.A., and Carroll, K., 1994. From Vanguard to Vanquished: The Declining Influence of Criminology Textbooks on Scholarship. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22: 559–567.
42. Wright, R.A., and Cohn, E.G., 1996. The Most-Cited Scholars in Criminal Justice Textbooks, 1989–1993. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24: 459–467.