Assessment of performance in science of 13 year old children in autonomie spa-nishi communities: Impact or bias;Evaluación del rendimiento en ciencias de los niños y niñas de 13 años de las distintas comunidades autónomas: Impacto o sesgo

Psicothema

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 323-332

  García, M Isabel Barbero ^a   Marañón, Pedro Prieto ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346277937     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ackcrman, T. A. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 1, 6791.
2. Adams, R. J. y Rowe, K. J. (1988). Item bias. En J. P. Reeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
3. Angoff, W. H. (1982): Use of difficulty and discrimination indices for detecting item bias. En R. A. Berk (Ed.). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University.
4. Barbero, I. Prieto, P. (1995). Efectos de la violatión de los supuestos del modelo de Rasch sobre la robustez de las estimaciones. Psicothemca, 7, 2, 419-426.
5. Bertrand, B. y King, F. (1989). Part I Sampling. En A World of Differences. An International Assessment of Mathematics and Science. Technical Report. Centre de Reserche et de Developpement en Mesure et Education. CREDME Université Lavai Québec-Canada.
6. Cohen, A. S. y Kim, S. H. (1993). A Comparison of Lord's x2 and Raju's Area Measures in Detection of DIP. APM, 17, 1, 39-52.
7. Ferrando, P. J. (1996). Evaluación de la unidimensionalidad de los ítems mediante Análisis factorial. Psicothema. 8, 2, 397-410.
8. Holland, P. W.; Thayer, D. T. (1986). Differential item functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Technical Report 86-89. Educational Testing Service Princeton NJ.
9. Holland, P. W. y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H. I. Braun (Eds.) Test validity, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Ironson, G. H. y Subkoviak, M. (1979). A comparison of several methods of assessing item bias. JEM, 16, 209-22.
11. Ironson, G. H. (1983). Using item response theory to measure bias. En R. K. Hambleton (Ed.). Applications of item response theory. Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
12. Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A. y Phillips, G. W. (1989). A World of Differences. An International Assessment of Mathematics and Science. Educational Testing Service.
13. Linn, R. L.; Harnisch, D. L. (1981). Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 109-118.
14. Lord, F. M. (1977). Practical Applications of Item Characteristic Curve Theory. Princenton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
15. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey, LEA.
16. Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E. y Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Identification of nonuriform differential item functioning using a variation of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Educational and Psichological measurement, 54, 2, 284-291.
17. Mellenberg, G. J. (1989). Item bias and Item Response Theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 2, 127-143.
18. Navas, M. J. (1993). Aplicación de la teoría de respuesta al ítem al campo dc la medida. Creatión de un banco de ítems para evaluar la capacidad matemática. Tesis doctoral (sin publicar).
19. Navas, M. J. (1994). Utilización del análisis factorial y medidas del área como métodos en la detección de sesgo. Psicothema, 6, 3, 493501.
20. Prieto, P. y Barbero, I. (1996). Detección del funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems mediante análisis de residuales: una aplicación de la TRI. Psicothema, 8, 1, 179-187.
21. Prieto, P. y Barbero, I. (). Identification of nonuniform DIP: A comparison of Mantel-Haens-zel and IRT analysis procedures. Educational and psychological Measurement (en prensa).
22. San Luis, C.; Prieto, P.; Sánchez-Bruno, A. y Barbero, I. (1994). GENESTE: un programa de control para TRI. Psicológica, 16, 297304.
23. Shepard, L.; Camilli, G.; Averill, M. (1981). Comparison of procedures for detecting test items bias with both internal and external ability criteria. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 317-375.
24. Shepard; Camilli; Williams (1985). Validity of approximation techniques for detecting item bias. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 2, 77-105.
25. Thissen, D.; Steinberg, L. y Wainer, H. (1988). Use of Item Response Theory in the Study of Group Differences in Trace Lines. En H. Wainer y Braun (Eds.) Test Validity. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.