Autobiography in science education: Greater objectivity through local knowledge

Research in Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-42

  Barton, Angela Calabrese ^a   Darkside, ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b University of Texas ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346274229     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461651     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Apple, M. (1994). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
4. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Writing sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Barton, A. C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. (1999). Science for social action: Transforming the harsh world. Submitted.
7. Britzman, D. (1986). Cultural myths and the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure. Harvard Education Review, 56, 442-456.
8. Delpit, L. (1988) The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
9. Dilthey, W. (1960). Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Harper and Row.
10. Franzosa, S. (1992). Authoring the educated self: Educational autobiography and resistance. Educational Theory, 42, 395-412.
11. Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Greene, M. (1978/1994) The lived world. In L. Stone (Ed.), The education feminism reader (pp. 17-25). New York: Routledge.
13. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest witness@second-millennium. Female man-meets-oncomouse: Feminisms and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
14. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
15. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress. New York: Routledge.
16. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Personal Narratives Group. (1989). Interpreting women's lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives. Bloomington, IN: University Press.
20. Polkinghorne, D. (1987). Narrative, knowing and the human sciences, New York: SUNY Press.
21. Probyn, E. (1990). Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 176-189). New York: Routledge.
22. Rich, A. (1979). On lies, secrets and silence. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
23. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897-930.
24. Steedman, C. (1986). Landscape for a good woman: A story of two lives. London: Virago Press.
25. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Willis, P. 1977. Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
27. Woolgar, S. (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.