Quantitative comparison of plantar foot shapes under different weight-bearing conditions

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 517-526

  Tsung, Bonnie Yuk San ^b   Zhang, Ming ^a   Fan, Yu Bo ^b   Boone, David Alan ^b  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Foot arch; Foot biomechanics; Foot shape; Insole; Orthotics; Shoe design

Indexed keywords

MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; OPTICAL SYSTEMS;

IMPRESSION CASTING METHOD; OPTICAL DIGITIZING SYSTEMS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY BUILD; BODY HEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; FEMALE; FOOT SOLE; HUMAN; IMPRESSION CASTING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OPTICAL DIGITIZING SYSTEM; PLANTAR FOOT SHAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 0346249953     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.11.0517     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Maslen BA, Ackland TR. Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. Clin Biomech 1994;9:291-96.
2. Hawes MR, Sovak D. Quantitative morphology of the human foot in a North American population. Ergonomics 1994;37:1213-26.
3. Freedman A, Huntington EC, Davis GC, Magee RB, Milstead VM, Kirkpatrick CM. Foot dimensions of soldiers. Third partial report project NT-13. Fort Knox: Armored Medical Research Laboratory; 1946.
4. Liu W, Miller J, Stefanyshyn D, Nigg BM. Accuracy and reliability of a technique for quantifying foot shape, dimensions and structural characteristics. Ergonomics 1999;42(2): 346-58.
5. Rossi WA. The high incidence of mismatched feet in population. Foot Ankle 1983;4:105-12.
6. Parham KR, Gordon CC, Bensel CK. Anthropometry of the foot and lower leg of U.S. Army soldiers: Fort Jackson, SC-1985. 1992, United States Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center: Natick, MA. Natick/TR-92/028:341.
7. Benninghoff A. Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. Urban and Schwarezenberg, Berlin-München, 1949.
8. Hohmann G. Fuss and Bein. Fünfte ergänzte Auflage. Verlag J.F. Bergmann 1951.
9. Carlsöö S, Wetzenstein H. Change of form of the foot and the foot skeleton upon momentary weight-bearing. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1968;39:413-23.
10. Kayano JJ. Dynamic function of medial foot arch. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1986;60:1147-56.
11. Umeki Y. Static results of medial foot arch. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1991;65(10):891-901.
12. Cheze L, Fregly BJ, Dimnet J. A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. J Biomech 1995;28:879-84.
13. Reinschmidt C, Van Den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, Lundberg A, Murphy N. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee motion during running. J Biomech 1997;30: 729-32.
14. Borchers RE, Boone DA, Joseph AW, Smith DG, Reiber GE. Numerical comparison of 3-D shapes: potential for application to the insensate foot. J Prosth Orthot 1995;7(1): 29-34.
15. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987;20:547.
16. Kogler GF, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Biomechanics of longitudinal arch support mechanisms in foot orthoses and their effect on plantar aponeurosis strain. Clin Biomech 1996;11(5):243-52.
17. MacConail MA, Basmajian JV. Muscles and movements: a basic for human kinesiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1969.