Reply to Kline, Laming, Lovie, Luce and Morgan

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 401-406

  Michell, Joel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346249762     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02647.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boring, E. G. (1921). The stimulus-error. American Journal of Psychology, 32, 449-171.
2. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20-40.
3. Cattell, J. McK. (1893). On errors of observation. American Journal of Psychology, 5, 285-293.
4. Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition, vol. 1. London: Duckworth.
5. Earman, J. (1993). Carnap, Kuhn, and the philosophy of scientific methodology. In P. Horwich (Ed.), World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, pp. 9-36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Falmagne, J.-C. (1971). The generalized Fechner problem and discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 22-43.
7. Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Elements of Psychophysical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Hölder, O. (1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Klasse, 53, 1-46.
9. (English translation of Part I by J. Michell & C. Ernst (1996), 'The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement'. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 235-252.)
10. Irzik, G. & Grünberg, T. (1995). Carnap and Kuhn: Arch enemies or close allies? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 285-307.
11. Krueger, L. E. (1989). Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 251-320.
12. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Laming, D. (1986). Sensory Analysis. London: Academic Press.
14. Laming, D. (1987). Psychophysics. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind, pp. 655-657. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Levine, M. V. (1970). Transformations that render curves parallel. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 410-443
16. Lovie, A. D. (1992). Context and Commitment: A Psychology of Science. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
17. Luce, R. D. (1972). What sort of measurement is psychophysical measurement? American Psychologist, 27, 96-106.
18. Michell, J. (1993). Numbers, ratios, and structural relations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71, 325-332.
19. Michell, J. (1994). Numbers as quantitative relations and the traditional theory of measurement. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 389-406.
20. Murray, D. J. (1993). A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 115-186.
21. Narens, L. (1996). A theory of ratio estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 109-129.
22. Stevens, S. S. (1936). Psychology: The propaedeutic science. Philosophy of Science, 3, 90-103.