Why technology should be integrated into the curriculum as a core subject

NASSP Bulletin

Volumn 83, Issue 608, 1999, Pages 1-15

  Gilberti, Anthony F ^a  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346249283     PISSN: 01926365     EISSN: 19301405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019263659908360801     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford.
2. American heritage dictionary of the English language. 1975. Boston: American Heritage & Houghton Mifflin.
3. Bowden, G.T. 1982. Becoming a scientifically literate nation. Educational Record 4: 5-8.
4. Boyer, E.L. 1983. High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Branscomb, A.W. 1981. Knowing how to know. Science, Technology & Human Values 36: 5-9.
6. Brungs, R. February 1987. Literacy: A common need. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Science, Technology, Society Conference: Technological Literacy, Washington, DC.
7. Bugliarello, G. 1982. Technology. New York: Polytechnic Institute Press.
8. Bybee, R.W. 1986. The Sisyphean question in science education: What should the scientifically and technologically literate person know, value, and do-as a citizen? In Science-technology-society NSTA yearbook, edited by R. W. Bybee. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
9. Cutcliffe, S.H. 1985. Understanding science, technology and engineering: An essential element of cultural literacy. Federation Review 4: 10-15.
10. DeVore, P.W. 1987. Science and technology: An analysis of meaning. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau 1: 2-9., 1980. Technology: An introduction. Worcester, Mass.: Davis.
11. Ellul, J. 1964. The technological society, trans. J. Wilkinson. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
12. Ferkiss, V. 1969. Technological man: The myth and the reality. New York: George Braziller.
13. Friedman, E.A. 1980. Dimensions of technological literacy in liberal education. Forum for Liberal Education 3: 1-16.
14. Gies, J.C. 1982. Technology: A new liberal art? AGB Reports 1: 17-20.
15. Hellman, H. 1976. Technophobia. New York: M. Evans.
16. Hersh, R.H. (1983a). Education and the corporate connection. Education Horizons 1: 5-8.
17. Hersh, R.H. 1983b. How to avoid becoming a nation of technopeasants. Phi Delta Kappan 9: 635-38.
18. Hurd, P.D. 1984. Reforming science education: The search for a new vision. Washington, D.C.: Council for Basic Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 242 515).
19. Layton, E. 1971. Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th-century America. Technology and Culture 4: 562-80.
20. Mendlovitz, S. H., ed. 1975. On the creation of a just world order: Preferred worldsfor the 1990s. New York: Free Press.
21. Mesthene, E.G. 1970. Technological change: Its impact on man and society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. Miller, J.B. February 1987. THX-1138 and the star thrower. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Science, Technology, Society Conference: Technological Literacy, Washington, D.C.
23. Naisbitt, J. 1982. Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner.
24. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). 1994. Conditions of education: Introduction to section B: Achievement, attainment, and curriculum. [On-line]. Available: www.ed.gov/pubs/stats.html.
25. Press, F. 1978. The agenda to technology and policy. Technology Review 3: 51-55.
26. Ramo, S. 1983. What's wrong with our technological society-And how to fix it. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Saxon, D.S. 1983. The place of science and technology in the liberal arts curriculum: Conference on science and technology education for civic and professional life-The undergraduate years. American Journal of Physics 1: 12-15.
28. Shamos, M.H. 1982. Science for everyone? New York University Education Quarterly 4: 2-10.
29. Snow, C.P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Suzuki, D. 1984. Science communication-Too little signal too much noise. Science Dimension 2: 30.
31. Task Force on Education for Economic Growth. 1983. Action for excellence: A comprehensive plan to improve our nation's schools. Washington, D.C.: Education Commission of the States.
32. Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. 1996. Reston, Va.: International Technology Education Association.
33. Toffler, A. 1970. Future shock. New York: Bantam.
34. Weaver, G.R. February 1987. Technology studies in a liberal arts context. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Science, Technology, Society conference: Technological Literacy, Washington, D.C.
35. Winner, L. 1977. Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36. Wright, T.R.; Israel, E.N.; and Lauda, D.P. 1993. Teaching technology: A teacher's guide. Reston, Va.: International Technology Education Association.