Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vascular System: A Practical Approach for the Radiologist

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 376-385

  Montgomery, Mark L ^a   Case, Robert S ^a  

^a SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Arteries; Contrast media; Gadolinium; Magnetic resonance angiography; Vascular studies

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM CHELATE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; CLAUDICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; VASCULAR DISEASE; VASCULAR TUMOR;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 0346244040     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002142-200310000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:143-149.
2. Shehadi WH. Contrast media adverse reactions: occurrence, recurrence, and distribution patterns. Radiology. 1982;143:11-17.
3. Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology. 1993;187:637-641.
4. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Szumowski J, et al. Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:197-203.
5. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, et al. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:693-701.
6. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:45-53.
7. Buijs PC, Klop RB, Eikelboom BC, et al. Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7:245-251.
8. Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with un-enhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;208:447-451.
9. Carroll TJ, Grist TM. Technical developments in MR angiography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:921-951.
10. Prince MR. Peripheral vascular MR angiography: the time has come. Radiology. 1998;206:592-593.
11. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, et al. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology. 1996;200:569-571.
12. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345-351.
13. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:683-692.
14. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;211:59-67.
15. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J, et al. Improved multi-station peripheral MR angiography with a dedicated vascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:475-480.
16. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR angiography for assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:835-846.
17. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity: American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA. 1995;274:875-880.
18. Schoenberg SO, Essig M, Bock M, et al. Comprehensive MR evaluation of renovascular disease in five breath holds. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:347-356.
19. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:497-504.
20. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:689-695.
21. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology. 1996;198:725-732.
22. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: original investigation. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:653-659.
23. Amparo EG, Hoddick WK, Hricak H, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology. 1985;154:451-456.
24. Petersen MJ, Cambria RP, Kaufman JA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:891-898; discussion 899.
25. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:656-669.
26. Ohno Y, Kawamitsu H, Higashino T, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:330-336.
27. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:484-491.
28. Herborn CU, Lauenstein TC, Ruehm SG, et al. Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:27-33.
29. Knopp MV, Schoenberg SO, Rehm C, et al. Assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance angiography: phase I studies. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:706-715.
30. Knopp MV, Giesel FL, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:694-702.
31. Wikstrom J, Wasser MN, Pattynama PM, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvic arteries. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:504-515.