MODFLOW equipped with a new method for the accurate simulation of axisymmetric flow

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-45

  Samani, N ^a   Kompani Zare, M ^a   Barry, D A ^b  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b King's Buildings   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flow to a well; Groundwater hydraulics; Groundwater modelling; Radial flow simulation

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STEADY FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW;

AXISYMMETRIC FLOW; GROUNDWATER HYDRAULICS;

WATER WELLS;

AXISYMMETRIC FLOW; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; UNSTEADY FLOW; WELL PUMP;

AQUIFER; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW;

EID: 0346243678     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barrash W. Dougherty M.E. Modeling axially symmetric and nonsymmetric flow to a well with MODFLOW, and application to Goddard2 well test, Boise, Idaho Ground Water 35 4 1997 602-611
2. Bear J. Dagan G. The relationship between solutions of flow problems in isotropic and anisotropic soils J. Hydrol. 3 1965 88-96
3. Bennet GD, Reilly TE, Hill MC. Technical training note in ground-water hydrology: radial flow to a well. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report: 89-4134, 1990, p. 83
4. Hantush M.S. Hydraulics of wells Chow V.T. Advances in hydroscience vol. 1 1964 281-432 Academic Press New York
5. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG. MODFLOW-2000. The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geol. Survey: Open File Report 00-92, 2000
6. Johnson G.S. Cosgrove D.M. Frederick D.B. A numerical model and spreadsheet interface for pumping test analysis Ground Water 39 4 2001 582-592
7. Lee T.C. Applied mathematics in hydrogeology 1999 Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, LA, United States
8. Lindner JB, Reilly TE. Analysis of three tests of the unconfined aquifer in southern Nassau County. Long Island, New York: US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82-4021, 1983, 51 pp
9. Moench A.F. Flow to a well in a Water-table aquifer: an improved Laplace transform solution Ground Water 34 4 1996 593-596
10. Mundorff MJ, Bennett GD, Ahmad M. Electric analog studies of flow to wells in the Punjab aquifer of West Pakistan. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1608-N, 1972, 28 pp
11. Pandit A. Aoun J.M. Numerical modeling of axisymmetric flow Ground Water 32 3 1994 458-464
12. Reilly TE. A Galerkin finite element flow model to predict the transient response of a radially symmetric aquifer. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2198, 1984, 33 pp
13. Reilly T.E. Harbaugh A.W. Simulation of cylindrical flow to a well using the US Geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model Ground Water 31 3 1993 489-494
14. Ruud N.C. Kabala Z.J. Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: Integrated well-face flux vs. uniform well-face flux boundary conditions J. Hydrol. 194 1997 76-94
15. Stallman RW. Electric analog of three-dimensional flow to wells and its application to unconfined aquifers. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1536-H, 1963, 37 pp
16. Theis C.V. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 16 1935 519-524
17. Todd D.K. Ground water hydrology 1959 John Wiley - Sons New York
18. Weeks E.P. Determining the ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability by aquifer-test analysis Water Resour. Res. 5 1 1969 196-214